Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Thursday July 06 2017, @03:33PM   Printer-friendly
from the of-mice-and-mien dept.

A study has found that mice with an impaired sense of smell gain less weight than other mice, even when calorie consumption and exercise levels are the same:

To conduct the study, molecular biologist Andrew Dillin of the University of California, Berkeley, and colleagues turned to a variety of genetically altered mice. The scientists gave them regular doses of the diphtheria toxin—which causes a temporary loss of odor-sensing neurons—to suppress their sense of smell. They then fed the rodents either a normal diet or fatty foods—the mouse equivalent of cheesecake and pizza—that usually induce obesity.

After more than 3 months of noshing on regular chow, the odor-deprived rodents weighed slightly less than mice whose sense of smell was intact. In the group on the high-fat diet, however, the mice that couldn't smell weighed 16% less than animals that could [open, DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.06.015] [DX], which became obese. Losing the ability to smell also caused a different group of already-obese mice to lose weight, the researchers reveal today in Cell Metabolism. The obvious explanation for this effect—that mice with impaired olfaction were eating less—turned out to be wrong. There was no difference in the animals' food consumption. Nor were the slim rodents getting more exercise. They weren't moving around their cages more than their porky counterparts.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by krishnoid on Thursday July 06 2017, @08:02PM (2 children)

    by krishnoid (1156) on Thursday July 06 2017, @08:02PM (#535848)

    There was no difference in the animals' food consumption. Nor were the slim rodents getting more exercise.

    So I'd assume they're pooping out more (undigested?) food than the smell-enabled mice -- would the ability to smell food tell their whole body, not just their mouth, to 'eat'? Maybe if you can't smell it as being food, the rest of the body can't tell it's food (second entry) [gotfuturama.com] and doesn't gear up (in time?) to absorb/store it as much.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 06 2017, @08:42PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 06 2017, @08:42PM (#535859)

    Exactly what I was going to say. Smelling food, even if you aren't going to eat it, gets your mouth salivating and your body releases some digestive related enzymes. If you skip that step, it's likely the body is less prepared for digestion and thus doesn't digest food as efficiently.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 06 2017, @09:22PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 06 2017, @09:22PM (#535882)

      > Smelling food, even if you aren't going to eat it, gets your mouth salivating ...

      Or even thinking about food. As I read your post my stomach started growling!