Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday July 07 2017, @09:25PM   Printer-friendly
from the one-is-not-enough dept.

OneDrive users around the world have been upset to discover that with its latest update, Microsoft's cloud file syncing and storage system no longer works with anything other than disks formatted with the NTFS file system. Both older file systems, such as FAT32 and exFAT, and newer ones, such as ReFS, will now provoke an error message when OneDrive starts up.

To continue to use the software, files will have to be stored on an NTFS volume. While FAT disks can be converted, ReFS volumes must be reformatted and wiped. This has left various OneDrive users unhappy. While NTFS is the default file system in Windows, people using SD cards to extend the storage on small laptops and tablets will typically use exFAT. Similarly, people using Storage Spaces to manage large, redundant storage volumes will often use ReFS. The new policy doesn't change anything for most Windows users, but those at the margins will feel hard done by.

In a rather odd statement made to OnMSFT, Microsoft said that it "discovered a warning message that should have existed was missing when a user attempted to store their OneDrive folder on a non-NTFS filesystem—which was immediately remedied." The company's position, apparently, is that OneDrive should always have warned about these usage scenarios and that it's only a bug or an oversight that allowed non-NTFS volumes to work.

Source: Ars Technica


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by jmorris on Friday July 07 2017, @09:35PM (12 children)

    by jmorris (4844) on Friday July 07 2017, @09:35PM (#536276)

    Don't just hate on Microsoft for being dicks here. They are, but there is a bigger lesson.

    If you depend on a cloud, you can never know when the rules will suddenly change or it will suddenly vanish.

    If you allow (i.e. Win10) your software vendor to force updates with no option to refuse toxic ones or roll one back, same thing. At someone else's whim things you depend on can and will suddenly change. And as a general rule, the sort of people who build and run this sort of system DO. NOT. CARE. ABOUT. YOU.

    Yes, offloading everything to "the cloud" is easy. But there is a price. There is always a price for taking the easy way.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=2, Informative=2, Total=4
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by MrGuy on Friday July 07 2017, @10:01PM (1 child)

    by MrGuy (1007) on Friday July 07 2017, @10:01PM (#536282)

    A similar lesson is that if you're going to rely on a vendor, and that vendor has a proprietary stake in one specific technology, and you want to use a different technology, be wary of assuming that vendor's impartiality, regardless of what they might claim.

    I wouldn't use Apple's iCloud from a Windows machine even if they support it (do they? never checked.) I don't run MS Office apps on my Mac, even though supposedly there are Mac versions that are in theory compatible. I don't trust someone who SELLS me music to HOST my music collection for me for free. Etc.

    • (Score: 1) by Acabatag on Saturday July 08 2017, @04:15AM

      by Acabatag (2885) on Saturday July 08 2017, @04:15AM (#536411)

      Point of order about Microsoft Office on the Mac:

      Microsoft first produced the Microsoft Office Applications for the Mac and then later ported them over to Windows. Yes, Excel in it's first version was a Mac-only product. And the graphical Microsoft Word that became the Windows titan later on started out on the Mac.

      Microsoft was one of the strongest vendors of applications for the Macintosh in the early years. They made more money per Mac desktop than from PC desktops for a time.

      This isn't intended as a campaign for people to get Microsoft Office for their Mac, just as a historical footnote.

  • (Score: 2) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Friday July 07 2017, @11:31PM (1 child)

    but I can't be bothered to look up the link.

    Mac OS X is quite aggressive in urging me to trust my precious data to the cloud.

    --
    Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by realDonaldTrump on Friday July 07 2017, @11:34PM (6 children)

    by realDonaldTrump (6614) on Friday July 07 2017, @11:34PM (#536313) Homepage Journal

    Modern cyber is hard. Even for Microsoft. I've met Satya Nadella, I hosted him at the White House. Very smart cookie. But you have to be Einstein to figure it out. Believe me, the last thing he wants is to lose customers. But it's hard to get the cyber right. Sometimes people try to do something, but they're not smart enough to really do it right. I see it all the time. Like Crooked Hillary. She used a wiper, she tried to wipe her EMAILS system, like with a cloth. But she got caught. She's smart, but not smart enough with the cyber. If she was smart enough she wouldn't have gotten caught. I like crooks who don't get caught. And Microsoft is O.K. A great American company. Not as smart as they need to be, but still great. #MAGA 🇺🇸

    • (Score: 2) by NewNic on Friday July 07 2017, @11:52PM (1 child)

      by NewNic (6420) on Friday July 07 2017, @11:52PM (#536321) Journal

      You forgot to say how you learned abut computers from Barron.

      --
      lib·er·tar·i·an·ism ˌlibərˈterēənizəm/ noun: Magical thinking that useful idiots mistake for serious political theory
      • (Score: 2) by realDonaldTrump on Saturday July 08 2017, @12:17AM

        by realDonaldTrump (6614) on Saturday July 08 2017, @12:17AM (#536329) Homepage Journal

        Isn't he adorable? He's slowly getting over what @KathyGriffin did. He's so good with computers, it's unbelievable. We named him after my former associate, John Barron. We'll be sending him to St. Andrew's in the fall. We would have let Barron meet Satya, except for the other men who came with him. Don't want any bad influences on my son. 🇺🇸

    • (Score: 2, Insightful) by frojack on Saturday July 08 2017, @04:31AM (3 children)

      by frojack (1554) on Saturday July 08 2017, @04:31AM (#536415) Journal

      Look dude, you're just not funny or clever enough to carry on with this any longer, so just change your login name or go back to posting AC, or just walk away.

      --
      No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
      • (Score: 2) by realDonaldTrump on Saturday July 08 2017, @04:45AM

        by realDonaldTrump (6614) on Saturday July 08 2017, @04:45AM (#536421) Homepage Journal

        I want Poland to become the 51st state. In Poland, everyone loves me. In California, not so much. But they have the right to die, it's fantastic. Think about that, it could be a great option. 🇺🇸

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 08 2017, @07:35PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 08 2017, @07:35PM (#536616)

        yeah sometimes there are gems, but really he has got to cut it out because the signal to noise ratio has way too much nice.

        The Donald, please put more focus into the quality of your run-on sentences--you can do it right, and you have... but if you put out too much low quality stuff, it becomes worse than just not funny--we'll stop paying attention to you.

        • (Score: 2) by butthurt on Saturday July 08 2017, @11:08PM

          by butthurt (6141) on Saturday July 08 2017, @11:08PM (#536679) Journal

          Believe me, I live for the ratings, and if people stopped paying attention, that would be the worst thing that ever happened to me. A disaster. Thank you for your tweet. 🇺🇸

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 07 2017, @11:50PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 07 2017, @11:50PM (#536320)

    a bigger lesson...If you depend on a cloud, you can never know when [problems happen]

    But bleep can happen with local stuff also. Companies typically don't manage local stuff well such that the cloud may still be a better average option even if not perfect. You could argue companies "should do X" and so forth, but they don't, and thus their economic reality will typically be based on what's likely to happen, NOT what happens under ideal circumstances. Cloud crap may be better than local crap from the org owner's or top management's perspective.