Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Tuesday July 11 2017, @09:03PM   Printer-friendly
from the something-about-this-bugs-me dept.

A Purdue researcher and a team of scientists working on a new insecticide argue that mosquitoes should not simply be made extinct due to their role in various ecosystems. Catherine Hill, a professor of entomology, and her team are developing an insecticide that will suppress mosquitoes' ability to transmit diseases without killing the insect or interfering with other life forms. The team is based in Discovery Park, a research park dedicated to using interdisciplinary teams to solve global problems. Hill's research was one of the winners of Discovery Park's Big Idea Challenge, a program that provides resources to interdisciplinary teams with innovative research.

"For the last 20 years I've been trying to figure out how to kill mosquitoes, and then I had this epiphany where, morally, I'm just not OK with it anymore," she said.

There has been a lack of research in preserving mosquitoes because researchers have looked mostly at ways to eradicate them. Therefore, Hill thinks it is essential to consider all the possible effects of wiping out an organism that has existed for thousands of years. She points out that mosquitoes have co-evolved with many species, so there are likely other organisms that depend on them as a food source.

https://phys.org/news/2017-07-mosquitoes.html

[Source]: Why mosquitoes should not be eliminated

I was reminded of:

Anyone who thinks that they are too small to make a difference has never tried to fall asleep with a mosquito in the room. - Christine Todd Whitman

Should there be a "Save the Mosquito" movement?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 12 2017, @08:58AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 12 2017, @08:58AM (#538003)

    Wherever there is an abundance of life, man moves in, and destroys whatever he can't tame. Sad, isn't it? And, ultimately, I wonder how well man will survive in his nice sterile world with no threats. Wipe out the mosquitos because we can't stand a little blood sacrifice to Nature, and with them, fish, birds, and who knows how many microscopic species. We do hate nature, don't we?

    Yes, yes we do.

    Just look at the ridicules "lawns" in North America. They are places of death. Green deserts. Then people bitch that the remnants of wildlife, like jackrabbits or ground squirrels or deer, destroy their vegetable gardens without a freaking clue as to why. You know, maybe because they have NOTHING to eat???

    I lived in the country and had a garden and there were tons of rabbits. Funny enough, they never touched the lettuce or carrots or anything else. Rabbits and deer all preferred the "weeds" instead. No, not grass. Almost nothing likes grass, even cows don't like grass. They like dandelions and clover and chickenweed. I saw ground squirrel go from one dandelion to another eating its seeds.

    https://extension.umd.edu/hgic/lawns/lawn-weed-identification [umd.edu]

    See those "problems"? Maybe if people didn't see these as problems, we would have a better world.

    But yes, humanity is mostly just "idiots at work". No clue what they are doing.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1