Columbia University's Knight First Amendment Institute has filed a lawsuit against President Trump for blocking seven users on Twitter, claiming that the action violates the users' First Amendment right to participate in a public political forum:
The institute filed suit today on behalf of seven Twitter users who were blocked by the president, which prevents them from seeing or replying to his tweets. It threatened legal action in a letter to Trump in June, and now "asks the court to declare that the viewpoint-based blocking of people from the @realDonaldTrump account is unconstitutional."
The lawsuit, which was filed in the Southern District of New York, elaborates on the Knight Institute's earlier letter. It contends that Trump's Twitter account is a public political forum where citizens have a First Amendment right to speak. Under this theory, blocking users impedes their right to participate in a political conversation and stops them from viewing official government communication. Therefore, if Trump blocks people for criticizing his political viewpoints, he'd be doing the equivalent of kicking them out of a digital town hall.
(Score: 2, Informative) by khallow on Thursday July 13 2017, @12:11AM
Of course, you can. Blocking [twitter.com] doesn't affect your ability to tweet. But you can still reply to Trump's tweets (though with some difficulty) and people can still read your replies.
It's basically just a normal anti-harassment tool. Given that blocking doesn't actually stifle anyone's speech and Twitter is not a government organization, there's no point to this lawsuit.