A one trillion tonne iceberg – one of the biggest ever recorded - has calved away from the Larsen C Ice Shelf in Antarctica. The calving occurred sometime between Monday 10th July and Wednesday 12th July 2017, when a 5,800 square km section of Larsen C finally broke away. The iceberg, which is likely to be named A68, weighs more than a trillion tonnes. Its volume is twice that of Lake Erie, one of the Great Lakes.
http://www.projectmidas.org/blog/calving/
Also at BBC, PBS, The Guardian, and The Verge.
Complete Calving Coverage:
Antarctic Larsen C Ice Shelf to Calve; Halley VI Research Station Plans Move
Antarctic Ice Rift Close to Calving, After Growing 17km in 6 Days
Delaware-Sized Iceberg Could Break Off of Antarctica at Any Moment
Larsen C Rift Branches as it Comes Within 5 km of Calving
(Score: 0, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 12 2017, @05:21PM (18 children)
If I hear about this goddamn ice chunk one more time!
(Score: 2) by bob_super on Wednesday July 12 2017, @05:49PM
You've had it with these monkey-fighting bergs on this monday-to-friday shelf?
(Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Wednesday July 12 2017, @05:52PM (2 children)
Unless it sinks another Titanic you probably won't hear about it again.
(Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 12 2017, @10:06PM (1 child)
How many Titanics has it sunk so far?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 13 2017, @03:38PM
None, but the chances that it sinks the original titanic are slim.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 12 2017, @06:17PM (12 children)
Simply switch to Lamestream Media.
Once you're consuming "content" from an entity which runs commercial ads for ExxonMobil[1] or Royal Dutch Shell or Atlantic Richfield, anything hinting at any of this will magically disappear.
(They don't want to offend the customer--and -you- aren't the customer; you are simply a consumer.)
[1] I've seen suggestions in alt-media [google.com] that this iceberg should be called out as #ExxonKnew.
Investigation Finds Exxon Ignored its Own Early Climate Change Warnings [soylentnews.org]
NY Attorney General Investigating ExxonMobil Over "Climate Change Lies" [soylentnews.org]
Royal Dutch Shell Knew Too: Decades-Long Climate Lies [soylentnews.org]
-- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 12 2017, @07:47PM (1 child)
yes, mega corps lie and so do your precious whore scientists.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 12 2017, @08:56PM
Somebody snapped, went off the deep end, reached the summit of Mt. Nutso, and made a quick stop at the loonie bin.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 12 2017, @08:43PM (9 children)
Why would this "magically disappear"? It's not related to global warming, it happens all the time, it won't raise sea level one iota. The only reason to suppress this story is a concern that stupid people on the Internet would mis-report it - oh, wait a minute, there are millions of stupid people on the Internet, that might happen after all.
(Score: 2) by HiThere on Wednesday July 12 2017, @09:25PM (1 child)
A small correction. It cannot be shown to be directly connected to global warming. This is not at all the same as saying it is not connected to global warming. There are clear indirect connections. True, they probably only affect the speed at which this kind of thing happens, but the speed is not unrelated to the size of the resultant berg, and it also affects the rate at which the glaciers are moving from the land onto the ocean (i.e., becoming ice shelves).
Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 12 2017, @09:43PM
I have no idea where people are getting this idea that climate change cannot be linked to any evidence. That doesn't even make sense. Here is a description of two of the people studying this discussing the evidence about a link to global warming:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/12/giant-antarctic-iceberg-breaks-free-of-larsen-c-ice-shelf [theguardian.com]
(Score: 3, Informative) by WalksOnDirt on Thursday July 13 2017, @12:15AM (6 children)
Actually, it will [phys.org], just not very much.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 13 2017, @12:20AM (5 children)
"But while the birth of the huge iceberg might look dramatic, experts say it will not itself result in sea level rises. “It’s like your ice cube in your gin and tonic – it is already floating and if it melts it doesn’t change the volume of water in the glass by very much at all,” said Hogg."
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/12/giant-antarctic-iceberg-breaks-free-of-larsen-c-ice-shelf [theguardian.com]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 13 2017, @12:38AM (3 children)
You have to wonder on whose payroll these "experts" are.
The post by WalksOnDirt mentions the difference in fresh water vs salt watter.
Yeah, that's a factor.
A bigger factor is that this ice hasn't always been floating.
It was part of the continental mass and -now- is floating.
True, an ice cube that is -already- in your drink won't raise the level of the fluid as it melts.
An ice cube that you take out of the bucket and drop into your drink WILL raise the level of the fluid.
This isn't even junior high Science.
Kids figure this out the first time they make their own iced drink.
Why you (and the "experts") don't grasp the concept remains a significant question.
-- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 13 2017, @01:04AM
It is an ice shelf, by definition it is floating:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_shelf [wikipedia.org]
(Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday July 13 2017, @01:13AM
When was it last not floating? My understanding is that while the ice of the shelf is relatively young (according to Wikipedia [wikipedia.org], about two centuries maximum age), the ice shelf itself has been floating for much longer than a couple of centuries and hence, has been around since before the industrial age.
(Score: 2) by WalksOnDirt on Thursday July 13 2017, @02:30PM
A fresh ice cube melting in fresh water won't. It will, slightly, if the water is salty.
(Score: 2) by WalksOnDirt on Thursday July 13 2017, @02:27PM
Which is in accord with what I said. There is only a slight change in volume from melting floating fresh ice into sea water, but it is definitely not none. Actually look at the link I posted, instead of ignoring it.
(Score: 2) by mcgrew on Thursday July 13 2017, @06:55PM
If science bores you, why in the hell are you here? You just like trolling?
mcgrewbooks.com mcgrew.info nooze.org