Remember when we discussed Rocks Request Rejection issue back in May? The discussion was nothing if not spirited.
Andrew Snelling, who got a PhD in geology before joining Answers in Genesis, continues working to interpret the canyon in a way that is consistent with his views. In 2013, he requested permission from the National Park Service to collect some rock samples in the canyon for a new project to that end.
...
The National Park Service sent Snelling's proposal out for review, having three academic geologists who study the canyon look at it. Those reviews were not kind. Snelling didn't get his permit. Snelling sued.
Well It turns out the guy gets to harvest his bag-o-rocks because the the National Park Service has decided its easier to give a few rocks than take the religious flack.
That lawsuit was withdrawn by Snelling on June 28. According to a story in The Australian, Snelling withdrew his suit because the National Park Service has relented and granted him his permit. He will be able to collect about 40 fist-sized samples, provided that he makes the data from any analyses freely available.
Further he promises to publish his findings in a peer reviewed journal. Perhaps even his own journal. Perhaps even his own peers.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by hendrikboom on Wednesday July 12 2017, @10:48PM
Einstein did theorize from the data. The photoelectric effect was a straightforward summary of the experimental results, only organised as an explanation instead of a puzzle.
Same for the special theory of relativity -- the relevant equations, such as the Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction, had been known for ages as a way to make electromagnetic theory work. What Einstein did was put these disparate phenomena together and notice that they yielded a consistent formalism.