Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Wednesday July 12 2017, @07:33PM   Printer-friendly
from the rocky-way-to-start-research dept.

Remember when we discussed Rocks Request Rejection issue back in May? The discussion was nothing if not spirited.

Andrew Snelling, who got a PhD in geology before joining Answers in Genesis, continues working to interpret the canyon in a way that is consistent with his views. In 2013, he requested permission from the National Park Service to collect some rock samples in the canyon for a new project to that end.
...
The National Park Service sent Snelling's proposal out for review, having three academic geologists who study the canyon look at it. Those reviews were not kind. Snelling didn't get his permit. Snelling sued.

Well It turns out the guy gets to harvest his bag-o-rocks because the the National Park Service has decided its easier to give a few rocks than take the religious flack.

That lawsuit was withdrawn by Snelling on June 28. According to a story in The Australian, Snelling withdrew his suit because the National Park Service has relented and granted him his permit. He will be able to collect about 40 fist-sized samples, provided that he makes the data from any analyses freely available.

Further he promises to publish his findings in a peer reviewed journal. Perhaps even his own journal. Perhaps even his own peers.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 13 2017, @09:57AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 13 2017, @09:57AM (#538648)

    In return, all the scientists ask is a few samples from religious relics. Oops, already did that and found them to be fake garbage.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by marcello_dl on Thursday July 13 2017, @01:47PM

    by marcello_dl (2685) on Thursday July 13 2017, @01:47PM (#538684)

    Are you talking about the shroud? Here some data points.

    Carbon 14 says it is around 1250ad
    Controversy over the procedures involving the sampling
    Shroud barely escaped a fire btw
    Other analysis says it enveloped the same body of shroud of Oviedo
    Shroud of oviedo dating back at least to 900ad and probably much earlier

    The rational conclusion is different from the science bigots conclusion. Not that I care about artifacts, personally I only raised my eyebrow when I learned the shroud was hosted in Turin, the esoteric capital, of all places.