After a few months of development, the Pale Moon browser has released its latest iteration. Along with security features, the key release for this version seems to be centered around expanding the browser's media support.
Offtopic, but somehow relevant: they also published the results of their survey in March. The feedback says a lot about the browser's user base, and highlights the direction the team will take in the future.
[What browser(s) do you use? Do you use a separate browser for certain sites? Same browser for everything you access online? What browser differences lead you to use one browser over another? -Ed.]
(Score: 4, Informative) by fustakrakich on Friday July 14 2017, @06:19AM (10 children)
Netscape [seamonkey-project.org].
Everything else is a fleeting instance of fame.
La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
(Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Friday July 14 2017, @07:01AM (3 children)
I did use Mosaic and then Netscape for a long time before moving to Firefox.
It worked pretty well.
However, SeaMonkey is *not* Netscape. It doesn't have any of the Netscape code. I did play with it a while ago. Perhaps I'll check it out again now that Firefox is turning to shit.
No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
(Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Friday July 14 2017, @07:02AM
Grr! Messed up the link to the Mosaic [wikipedia.org] Wikipedia page.
No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
(Score: 2) by dry on Saturday July 15 2017, @07:22AM (1 child)
Actually it does, along with Firefox, there's still some code from Netscape in NSPR and NSS, both of which are very conservative about excepting patches, other code such as the widgets where the skeleton is left over from Netscape but most of the code has been updated and in the case of SeaMonkey,or its source name, suite, the mailnews and the suite itself are direct descendants of Netscape, perhaps most of the code has been changed, but some still dates from the initial CVS import.
Understand that SeaMonkey shares most of its code with Firefox and being a volunteer project, it's all they can do to keep up with the Firefox build changes. When Firefox moves away from XUL, XPCOM etc, SeaMonkey will probably die, or at least no longer be worth using for the same reasons as Firefox.
(Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Saturday July 15 2017, @08:38AM
That may well be. I based my statement on information from here [wikipedia.org]:
nss and nspr are essential modules, but the bulk of seamonkey code bears no resemblance to any production Netscape code.
No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
(Score: 2) by FatPhil on Friday July 14 2017, @07:50AM (3 children)
So no torrent client? That's not "all my internet needs", then. And why limit things to clients - my internet needs include provision of services too. Seamonkey does not do what nginx does, nor act as a file server on any level.
Lesson - when marketting people use the word "you", usually they mean "some imaginary other person".
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 14 2017, @03:18PM (2 children)
Probably dropped gopher support as well. Lynx can still go after gophers though.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 15 2017, @02:05AM (1 child)
Archie, is that you?!?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 15 2017, @06:56AM
Most modern browsers still support FTP AFAIK.
(Score: 1) by Z-A,z-a,01234 on Friday July 14 2017, @10:11AM
Yesir! I've been using it from ~2001 and never felt that the other browsers were in any way better.
(Score: 2) by t-3 on Friday July 14 2017, @04:00PM
Yep, Seamonkey is the best, I use it for any serious browsing. I do use dmenu + surfraw + luakit for quick searches, but the instability (doesn't handle tiling wm well, the renderer crashes whenever window size changes), and config changes every update make it too much work to be my main browser.