Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Friday July 14 2017, @09:09AM   Printer-friendly
from the levitating-shopping-carts dept.

Submitted via IRC for AndyTheAbsurd

Hyperloop One claims that its prototype ultra-fast train has completed a first full systems test in a vacuum, reaching a speed of 70 mph. The sled was able to magnetically levitate on the track for 5.3 seconds and “reached nearly 2Gs of acceleration,” according to the company.

The test was conducted privately but Hyperloop One offered some video that included footage from testing. Based on that footage plus a few seconds of additional b-roll shared with media, a lightweight skeleton sled uses a linear motor to accelerate, levitates briefly, and then comes to a halt as the brakes are applied.

Hyperloop One was created as an answer to a challenge from Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, who wrote a white paper envisioning a mode of transportation that would send pods at speeds greater than 700mph using a low-friction environment and levitation using air bearings.

Source: Ars Technica


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by SomeRandomGeek on Friday July 14 2017, @02:51PM (1 child)

    by SomeRandomGeek (856) on Friday July 14 2017, @02:51PM (#539128)

    The trick is to have the vehicle stop fewer times. So, you make every train an express train. Consequently every passenger experiences an effective speed that is the same as the vehicle's maximum speed. Of course to run so many express trains, there is a smaller demand for each train. So you have to run more trains, each with fewer passengers. The smaller trains needed for the reduced number of passengers can be lighter, which dramatically reduces the cost of building the road bed needed to carry the trains. With many smaller trains, the system becomes dependent on fully automated vehicles, for both cost and safety reasons.

    Whether the system will work has a lot more to do with logistics than technology. Of course there is a way to build it so that it will be slow, inconvenient, and expensive. There is also a way to make it fast and convenient, with costs TBD.

  • (Score: 2) by Aiwendil on Friday July 14 2017, @05:10PM

    by Aiwendil (531) on Friday July 14 2017, @05:10PM (#539208) Journal

    Which also increases the overhead per passenger (then again - a modern train is at about 500-750kg/seated passenger, so quite a bit to fiddle with).

    But yeah, I agree that the issue is with routing - just like with normal trains (the reason why the Shinkansen is on time all the time - dedicated tracks) - and I kinda look forward to seeing just how they plan in integrating the recently-stopped capsule with the at max-speed-flow, I'm curious just how much redudancy you must build into it for that (for normal trains they use long stretches of rail, with the relative speed being higher in the hyperloop...). However, with the low capacity of the hyperloop the routing either will be nightmarish [quite a few capsules] or it will be mosly empty (trains solve the routing to a large degree by using higher capacity carriers - thereby needing less routing).

    So yeah - still wondering what the hype is about with the Hyperloop. :)