Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by mrpg on Saturday July 15 2017, @03:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the dust-and-ice dept.

Giant mud balls roamed the early solar system

The earliest asteroids were probably made of mud, not rock. Radioactive heat in the early solar system could have melted globs of dust and ice before they had a chance to turn to rock [open, DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1602514] [DX], a new simulation published July 14 in Science Advances shows. The results could solve several puzzles about the composition of meteorites found on Earth and may explain why asteroids are different from comets.

[...] Bland reasoned that heat from radioactive decay would melt the ice, and the resulting body would be an enormous dollop of mud. The mud would suspend sediment particles, so they wouldn't be stripped of their sunlike elements. And it would allow the early asteroids to be any size and remain cool.

Bland and Bryan Travis of the Planetary Science Institute, who is based in Los Alamos, N.M., ran computer models of how the mud balls would evolve. Convection currents, like those that move molten rock within the Earth's mantle, would develop, helping to transfer heat into space, the models showed. After several million years, the ball would harden completely, yielding the asteroids seen today.

NASA will make a decision within the next two months on whether to extend the Dawn mission to another asteroid, leaving Ceres.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by bzipitidoo on Saturday July 15 2017, @04:57AM (3 children)

    by bzipitidoo (4388) on Saturday July 15 2017, @04:57AM (#539470) Journal

    What I wonder is, shouldn't most asteroids be nearly spherical, with their matter separated into layers of progressively denser material towards the core, just like planets, if they started as something as flexible as mud?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 15 2017, @05:41AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 15 2017, @05:41AM (#539474)

    You are overthinking this, bzipitidoo. Do you think that mud, exposed to the vacuum and (near) absolute zero conditions of space, could have condensed into delicious layers of vanilla, chocolate, and pistaschio, like planets do? Of course not! Flash freezing produces homogenuous bodies, frozen in time, and not exactly round or even spherical, because, you know, the universe is only 6,000 years old, so there was not time for this. It is all in my "bag of rocks" at "Assholes in Genesis"! Oh, and: the earth is flat, because it looks that way, the Earth is the center of the Universe, because Einstein said and even though he was a Jew it fits my Anthropogenic Global Centric theory. Oh, and, Gravity is not real, the Universe works on Russian Electricity, and that is what produce the Craters on the moon and sean hannity is wright that the main stream meidal is tryoing to destroyp; trumpldjlgj an chem-trails. jkfjljf slLOck here Up LOck her ups and omg bohica ptsd for all the Armenian, I mean American, kardashian, omg, look at her butt! I cannot lie, I am Republican, and I am insane. Please, help me. Impeach the bastard.

  • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Saturday July 15 2017, @08:16AM (1 child)

    by kaszz (4211) on Saturday July 15 2017, @08:16AM (#539489) Journal

    I don't interpret the articles finding that way. Small masses in free space means microgravity at most. And the convection currents should mix all of it continuously while at the same time making any fluid evaporate. When there's no fluid left it will be as it was, ie mixed. The non-spherical shape may come from being smashed by other objects and ripped apart by gravity wells.

    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by deimtee on Saturday July 15 2017, @12:33PM

      by deimtee (3272) on Saturday July 15 2017, @12:33PM (#539524) Journal

      If you haven't got enough gravity for density separation then you aren't going to get convection either. They are basically the same mechanism, with density changes due to different materials being a much stronger effect than temperature-related density changes.
      I would surmise that you would only get convection within layers of otherwise uniform density. i.e. after a while you would have a core of heavy metals, a thick layer of rock shading into silt, then the layer of water. The water would presumably boil off into space.
      Would possibly explain really high % nickel-iron meteorites, they are parts of cores of smashed asteroids with all the rock knocked off.

      --
      If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.