Datamation examines the Debian and Ubuntu distros in detail by starting with the question, what is the difference between Debian and Ubuntu? Neither GNU/Linux distro has been out of Distrowatch's top six since 2005, and for the last four years neither has been out of the top three. There are good reasons for that. Though if systemd is not your cup of tea, there is also a Debian fork, Devuan, which is basically Debian GNU/Linux minus systemd.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Sunday July 16 2017, @03:46PM (7 children)
"We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free software community."
And - who are Debian's users? Or, more to the point, who were Debian's users when the contract was written? Even today, the real rookies aren't drawn especially to Debian. The less experienced, less sophisticated users are magnetically drawn to Ubuntu sub-distros, including Linux Mint. As they gain experience and sophistication, SOME of those users move on to Debian and other distros.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 16 2017, @03:55PM (3 children)
Ah, yes... the "noobs will be noobs" defense.
Pray, continue to tell us how much you are better than everyone else for using a 'hardcore' distro and how all these noobs are fucking up your life.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Sunday July 16 2017, @05:03PM
The "noobs" thing is what it is. Ubuntu strives to be easy to work with. It seemed to many of us that it was trying to be Linux' version of Windows, especially with that whole Unity/Metro thing. People who have never opened a CLI in their lives could be comfortable on Ubuntu. My own wife fits into that crowd, or very nearly so. She has actually used DOS a little bit, and can open a Command prompt on Windows. She, at least, recognizes a terminal for what it is. Many people don't.
And, those of us who consider ourselves to be "real" Linux users can't imagine computers without a terminal.
It is what it is, and none of your objections will change the facts of life. Maybe I fail to express it properly, and/or maybe you fail to understand it properly, but it remains what it is, and there are very separate target audiences addressed by the two distros.
Ubuntu worked hard to capture the Windows crowd, while Debian went on with what they have always done. By definition, that contract caters to Debian Linux users, not to Windows users.
(Score: 2) by ragequit on Monday July 17 2017, @03:13AM (1 child)
I use Slackware. Migrated all the servers from Suse to Ubuntu in 2013 (service contract expired); all servers to Slackware in 2014. Never regretted the decision. No Ubuntu, I do not want to reboot to apply your updates.
The above views are fabricated for your reading pleasure.
(Score: 2) by kaszz on Thursday July 20 2017, @01:03AM
How do you handle new kernel fixes without reboot? I think I read something about a such feature.
(Score: -1, Flamebait) by Ethanol-fueled on Sunday July 16 2017, @03:59PM (1 child)
Mint sucks shit. I have explained why many times on this website. I wish the muh Linux Mint meme would fucking go away already.
Ubuntu sucks. But you can configure it to be as perfect as you like.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Sunday July 16 2017, @05:06PM
Linux Mint isn't bad. LMDE, or, Linux Mint Debian Edition is better, IMHO, but Mint is alright. I ran Mint for awhile, then I ran LMDE. I was happy with them, until I hopped to a different distro. For that matter, the only reason I broke with Ubuntu was the Unity thing. My wife would still be running Ubuntu, if not for Unity.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 16 2017, @10:34PM
Well, my mom... seriously...
and no, she's the opposite of a geeky user.