Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday July 17 2017, @03:27PM   Printer-friendly
from the swear-on-a-stack-of-K&Rs dept.

At The Guardian, Cathy O'Neil writes about why algorithms can be wrong. She classifies the reasons into four categories on a spectrum ranging from unintential errors to outright malfeasance. As algorithms now make a large portion of the decisions affecting our lives, scrutiny is ever more important and she provides multiple examples in each category of their impact.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 17 2017, @04:55PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 17 2017, @04:55PM (#540394)

    That algorithm doesn't lie. It is not its fault that you interpret the string it dutifully outputs as saying that one equals two. It didn't intend to lead you to that interpretation. It has no concept of humans interpreting its output. And it has no intentions whatsoever.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Touché=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 17 2017, @05:42PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 17 2017, @05:42PM (#540425)

    Now explain that to idiots who write articles like this one, PHBs, and CxOs.