Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Monday July 17 2017, @05:04PM   Printer-friendly
from the you-are-what-you-eat dept.

After becoming somewhat used to food scares from China, now we have sleazy operators in Europe too.

From the ABC News article:

Authorities have arrested at least 66 people in a European food scam which sold horse meat unfit for human consumption.

European Union police coordinating organization Europol announced Sunday that eight nations cooperated in the operation. In Spain, 65 people face a series of charges relating to public health, money laundering and animal abuse.

The operation took several months and the chief suspect, a Dutch businessman, was arrested in Belgium in April.

Spain's Civil Guard said that the criminal ring acquired horses in Spain and Portugal that were "in poor shape, old, or had been designated 'not apt for consumption.'" After falsifying paperwork and substituting microchips used to identify the horses, the animals were slaughtered and the meat shipped to Belgium.

The Civil Guard said that the profits from the illegal meat could reach 20 million euros ($23 million) a year.

The case was linked to a 2013 scandal when Irish authorities detected beef burgers containing horse meat.

Is it still safe to consume Soylent?

Additional details at CNN.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 17 2017, @11:24PM (6 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 17 2017, @11:24PM (#540628)

    ... someone who believes that interaction should, as much as possible, occur in accordance with rules to which the interacting parties agreed in advance of interaction (this is an iterative process that becomes ever more voluntary through repeated negotiations, dispute resolutions, and enforcements, as per the agreements); a capitalist is someone who rejects coercion—a capitalist is someone who is wary of interaction that occurs outside of a contract.

    (Note that such rules may well provide for some kind of violent action as a valid, agreed response to some condition).

    Socialism can be built atop capitalism, but capitalism cannot be built atop socialism.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Offtopic=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Offtopic' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   -1  
  • (Score: 2) by KGIII on Monday July 17 2017, @11:36PM (5 children)

    by KGIII (5261) on Monday July 17 2017, @11:36PM (#540636) Journal

    I would suggest the Wikipedia article. It's not too bad. Libertarian is the opposing side of Authoritarian and takes many, many forms. It's also scaled, so that extremes don't actually have to be assumed.

    If you're curious, I fall in the lower-left quadrant on the political compass. I'm very much a Libertarian. However, my party seems to have gone off the deep end and, largely, become batshit crazy. Rand was an idiot, for example.

    Seriously, give the Wikipedia article a skim. It's not too bad.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 18 2017, @01:38AM (4 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 18 2017, @01:38AM (#540686)

      I basically gave a much more concrete description of what you said:

      Libertarian is the opposing side of Authoritarian

      • (Score: 2) by KGIII on Tuesday July 18 2017, @02:57AM (3 children)

        by KGIII (5261) on Tuesday July 18 2017, @02:57AM (#540717) Journal

        Because your definition is both incomplete and misleading. Just the first half dozen paragraphs will help. It's not very difficult.

        --
        "So long and thanks for all the fish."
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 18 2017, @03:15AM (2 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 18 2017, @03:15AM (#540735)

          My definition is neither incomplete nor misleading; indeed, it is both complete and forthright.

          • (Score: 2) by KGIII on Tuesday July 18 2017, @04:07AM (1 child)

            by KGIII (5261) on Tuesday July 18 2017, @04:07AM (#540767) Journal

            You would save bandwidth if you just read the article, but it's all good. You do you, I suppose.

            --
            "So long and thanks for all the fish."
            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 18 2017, @06:36AM

              by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 18 2017, @06:36AM (#540829)

              My definition is already both complete and clear.