Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday July 25 2017, @03:46AM   Printer-friendly
from the paint.net? dept.

Microsoft Paint has been marked for death:

The era of Microsoft Paint appears to be coming to an end with the upcoming release of the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update. The image-editing application is officially being classified by Microsoft as a "deprecated feature," as noted by The Guardian. That means that, come this fall, Paint will "not be in active development and might be removed in future releases."

I go hard in the paint.

Also at PCWorld and Smithsonian.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Tuesday July 25 2017, @08:24AM (9 children)

    by kaszz (4211) on Tuesday July 25 2017, @08:24AM (#544084) Journal

    old sync protocol = WebRTC?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by linuxrocks123 on Tuesday July 25 2017, @01:27PM (8 children)

    by linuxrocks123 (2557) on Tuesday July 25 2017, @01:27PM (#544156) Journal
    • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Tuesday July 25 2017, @04:45PM (7 children)

      by kaszz (4211) on Tuesday July 25 2017, @04:45PM (#544221) Journal

      The stuff that keeps your bookmarks etc on a central site?

      Hard lesson in not-your-computer-zap.

      • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Tuesday July 25 2017, @05:00PM (6 children)

        by maxwell demon (1608) on Tuesday July 25 2017, @05:00PM (#544233) Journal

        Hard lesson in not-your-computer-zap.

        Had you read carefully, you had noticed the following line:

        I run my own server and didn't want to upgrade it.

        So no, this is not a case of not-your-computer.

        --
        The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
        • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Tuesday July 25 2017, @05:17PM (5 children)

          by kaszz (4211) on Tuesday July 25 2017, @05:17PM (#544244) Journal

          But you had to consciously re-configure it to do that?
          All too often various software tries to sideline users into someone-elses-computer because it's so convenient. Well until it's gone ;)
          I specifically recall Mozilla wanting to sync bookmarks etc, because it was sooo much easier. And I was like "fuck no" ;-)

          • (Score: 3, Insightful) by linuxrocks123 on Tuesday July 25 2017, @09:43PM (4 children)

            by linuxrocks123 (2557) on Tuesday July 25 2017, @09:43PM (#544330) Journal

            Well, actually, if I'd originally allowed Firefox to sync with Mozilla's servers, they would have automatically migrated me to Sync 1.5, and I wouldn't have had a problem. The only reason there was a problem was I chose to run my own server, so an issue arose when they removed support for the old protocol. So, if there's a juvenile "lesson" to be learned from my experience, it's not to host your own server.

            There isn't one, though because I'm happy with all my choices in the matter. I could have also self-hosted the Sync 1.5 server, and kept using Firefox, but switching to Pale Moon seemed easier and I liked Pale Moon's direction more. I still ask about other browsers every so often, though, because it's worth keeping an eye on all the options.

            • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Wednesday July 26 2017, @12:17AM (3 children)

              by kaszz (4211) on Wednesday July 26 2017, @12:17AM (#544377) Journal

              The thing that Mozilla has against it is that it lack one process per tab. That method handles some issues a lot better.

              • (Score: 2) by Pino P on Wednesday July 26 2017, @04:35PM (2 children)

                by Pino P (4721) on Wednesday July 26 2017, @04:35PM (#544718) Journal

                e10s-multi is expected to be released in Firefox 55, with up to four content processes so as not to overuse RAM the way Chrome or Chromium can with many processes [erahm.org]. A lot of devices still in use still have 2 GB or less with no way to upgrade other than complete replacement of the device, such as a mobile device or a laptop whose chipset can't recognize modules larger than 2 GB. I already see the improvement in 55.0b11, though occasionally I think I might be getting unlucky when multiple heavy tabs get assigned to the same content process.

                • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Wednesday July 26 2017, @04:47PM (1 child)

                  by kaszz (4211) on Wednesday July 26 2017, @04:47PM (#544730) Journal

                  Can it shuffle tabs between these four processes? interesting concept. If it's possible to configure number of processes it would be really great.

                  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Pino P on Wednesday July 26 2017, @05:55PM

                    by Pino P (4721) on Wednesday July 26 2017, @05:55PM (#544767) Journal

                    Can it shuffle tabs between these four processes?

                    I'm not aware of such functionality.

                    If it's possible to configure number of processes it would be really great.

                    Four is what Mozilla engineers have determined to be just right [medium.com] for typical desktop scenarios. But if you have the RAM for it, open about:config and increase dom.ipc.processCount.