Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Wednesday July 26 2017, @05:55AM   Printer-friendly
from the I'm-sorry-Dave,-I-can't-do-that dept.

[...] some experts believe as much as 95% of passenger miles could be electric, autonomous by 2030, thanks to some basic economics. Because electric vehicles cost a whole lot less to drive and maintain—but more to buy—and because autonomous vehicles greatly reduce the cost of commercial driving, a combination of the two technologies will make autonomous Transportation as a Service exponentially more cost competitive than either owning a car, or hiring a car and driver. It's also exponentially more profitable for car companies, who have long feared the loss of maintenance and service profits associated with a transition to electric cars.

This question will come up more frequently as self-driving technology advances. Will perfection of that technology make a difference, though, in the face of social behaviors that have been deeply ingrained over the past century?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 26 2017, @02:56PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 26 2017, @02:56PM (#544659)

    > Their value isn't from running a fleet of vehicles, it's from running the booking system.

    Uber's "value" is from idiot investors.

    For a company (whose only products are an app and a huge team of lawyers) to lose $2.8 billion in a single year is a spectacular feat. Anyone who thinks this company is headed for success deserves their impending investment loss.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uber_(company) [wikipedia.org]
    http://www.businessinsider.com/uber-2016-financial-numbers-revenue-losses-2017-4/ [businessinsider.com]