Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday July 26 2017, @09:06AM   Printer-friendly
from the that's-his-soapposition dept.

Language patterns could be predicted by simple laws of physics, a new study has found.

Dr James Burridge from the University of Portsmouth has published a theory using ideas from physics to predict where and how dialects occur.

He said: "If you want to know where you'll find dialects and why, a lot can be predicted from the physics of bubbles and our tendency to copy others around us.

"Copying causes large dialect regions where one way of speaking dominates. Where dialect regions meet, you get surface tension. Surface tension causes oil and water to separate out into layers, and also causes small bubbles in a bubble bath to merge into bigger ones.

"The bubbles in the bath are like groups of people - they merge into the bigger bubbles because they want to fit in with their neighbours.

"When people speak and listen to each other, they have a tendency to conform to the patterns of speech they hear others using, and therefore align their dialects. Since people typically remain geographically local in their everyday lives, they tend to align with those nearby."

Is proximity the determinant to dialect, or is identity?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 26 2017, @09:45AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 26 2017, @09:45AM (#544557)

    i love the way you troll us phoenix, and i think that proximity=f(identity); err, that who you are ([self-]identify-as) determines who you are proximate to by selecting who you do the oil-bubble blending with, err, are even talking or listening to. So we basically master local dialects if it suits us to gain the benefits of group-membership (and now we're back to identity) :-) nice troll. nice 1d stoner analogy too.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 26 2017, @11:17AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 26 2017, @11:17AM (#544584)

    Is proximity the determinant to dialect?

    It's not the determinant [wikipedia.org], is the trace [wikipedia.org] (with is related with the derivative of the determinant). You get it now?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 26 2017, @07:48PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 26 2017, @07:48PM (#544823)

    I think it is a matter of social proximity (people that speak to each other), which is a property of physical proximity and social identity (and surely a few other things).