Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Wednesday July 26 2017, @11:03PM   Printer-friendly
from the threat-group dept.

On Friday, representatives of the notorious hacking entity known as Fancy Bear failed to appear in a federal court in Virginia to defend themselves against a civil lawsuit brought by Microsoft.

As the Daily Beast first reported on Friday, Microsoft has been waging a quiet battle in court against the threat group, which is believed to be affiliated with the GRU, Russia's foreign intelligence agency. For now, the company has managed to seize control of 70 domain names, but it's going after many more.

The idea of the lawsuit, which was filed in August 2016, is to use various federal laws—including the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), and American trademark law—as a way to seize command-and-control domain names used by the group, which goes by various monikers, including APT28 and Strontium. Many of the domain names used by Fancy Bear contain Microsoft trademarks, like microsoftinfo365.com and hundreds of others.

In June 2017, Microsoft asked the judge to issue a default judgement in its favor, since the individuals behind Fancy Bear have not made themselves known. According to the Daily Beast, Microsoft and its lawyers have made several attempts to serve the unknown "John Does" via e-mail. According to the Daily Beast, those e-mails have been opened dozens of times and were equipped with a tracking beacon. Microsoft's lawyers have also conveniently posted all the court documents on a public website, inviting the defendants to contact them via postal mail, e-mail, or even fax.

Source: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/07/microsoft-targets-fancy-bears-domains-in-trademark-lawsuit/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by MostCynical on Wednesday July 26 2017, @11:52PM (1 child)

    by MostCynical (2589) on Wednesday July 26 2017, @11:52PM (#544927) Journal

    Not sure when this behaviour started, but sometime between 1975 and now, it became self-fulfilling: didn't matter what Microsoft did to customers, they kept coming back.
    Bloatware? Removing functionality? Making updates worse (and worse..)? Telemetry? Auto-updates? Etc etc..

    Apparently, you can fool most of the people, most of the time.

    --
    "I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Thursday July 27 2017, @07:28AM

    by kaszz (4211) on Thursday July 27 2017, @07:28AM (#545036) Journal

    Most people are fools? ;-)

    But let's not forget the executive class with power and lesser clue. No one gets fired for buying IBM and then someone offers new shiny bits for that machine.. *like moths to the light* ..