Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Thursday July 27 2017, @07:28AM   Printer-friendly
from the call-a-spade-a-spade dept.

Common Dreams reports

As President Donald Trump continues to behave bizarrely and erratically--attacking his own attorney general, launching into a political tirade during a speech to Boy Scouts, bringing his 11-year-old son into the burgeoning Russia controversy--a professional association of psychoanalysts is telling its members to drop the so-called Goldwater Rule and comment publicly on the president's state of mind if they find reason to do so.

The Goldwater Rule was formally included in the American Psychiatric Association's "Principles of Medical Ethics" following the 1964 presidential campaign, during which a magazine editor was sued for running an article in which mental health professionals gave their opinions on [Republican] presidential candidate Barry Goldwater's psychiatric state. The rule deems public comments by psychiatrists on the mental health of public officials without consent "unethical".

In a recent email to its 3,500 members, the American Psychoanalytic Association "told its members they should not feel bound by" the Goldwater Rule, which some have characterized as a "gag rule", STAT's Sharon Begley reports.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday July 27 2017, @11:58PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday July 27 2017, @11:58PM (#545533) Journal

    Lefties stating their political opinions is one thing. A leftist "medical" profession passing judgement on political figures is quite another thing. You know that, and I know that, why do you even try to confuse the issue?

    If Joe Blow arrives on the scene of an accident (Yes, our political picture does resemble the scene of a disaster.) and voices random opinions about what should be done, that's cool. But, if Joe claims to be an EMT, a nurse, paramedic, or doctor, he had BETTER know just what the hell he is talking about, because people will take him seriously.

    Joe Blow the non-medical passerby may suggest a tourniquet around the neck, and no one takes the damned fool seriousl. Joe Blow the medical professional suggests a tourniquet around the neck, and you can bet your ass that SOMEONE believes Joe, just because he's a doctor. Joe is still a damned fool, but he's a DOCTOR!!

    In this specific case, shrinks aren't competent to voice political opinions, so they shouldn't be using their "professional" status to lend weight to their political opinions.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2