Facebook is helping to round up blasphemers, that is to say those who insult or deny islam, and deliver them to justice in Pakistan. By engaging in illegal speech on social media they leave a trail of evidence which the government is able to request and Facebook complies with. The anti-blasphemy laws are also useful in cracking down on dissent in general as the penalty for blasphemy in Pakistan is now death.
In recent months, Pakistan's interior minister, Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan, has increased pressure on Facebook and Twitter to identify individuals suspected of blasphemy. On 7 July, Facebook's vice-president of public policy, Joel Kaplan, met with Khan to discuss the government's demand that Facebook either remove blasphemous content or be blocked in the country.
On Monday, Facebook confirmed that it had rejected Pakistan's demand that new accounts be linked to a mobile phone number – a provision that would make it easier for the government to identify account holders. Currently, opening a Facebook account in Pakistan requires only an email address, while mobile phone users must provide fingerprints to a national database.
That social media would become the means for a government crackdown on free speech is a bitter twist for platforms that claim to want to increase openness and the free flow of ideas.
The advent of social media once heralded an opening for religious debate in Pakistan. Platforms such as Facebook, WhatsApp and Viber allowed individuals in conservative, rural areas to engage in discussions that were once possible only for students and urban intellectuals, unconstrained by the conservative norms of their communities.
"Until recently, social media afforded a measure of privacy where you could discuss the hypocrisy of people whose behavior was loathsome but who wore the thick garb of piety," said Pervez Hoodbhoy, a prominent academic and activist.
"Now the state is saying that we will track you down wherever you are and however you might want to hide," Hoodbhoy added. "Pakistan is fast becoming a Saudi-style fascist religious state."
The problem with engaging in potentially illegal speech on social media, of course, is that online speech leaves evidence.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 27 2017, @05:28PM (3 children)
Oh, nice!
Now FB is friends with a nation only slightly less dysfunctional than Venezuela, one that has nuclear weapons.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 27 2017, @06:06PM (2 children)
Don't trust the MSM on Venezuela, in particular the US press.
If you check the bylines on most articles, they are from people coming from the deep right wing of Venezuelan politics.
(Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 27 2017, @08:08PM
The US press is very popular in Venezuela now, since bath tissue is practically non-existent.
http://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-latin-america-22602331/venezuelans-caught-short-as-toilet-paper-supplies-run-low [bbc.com]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 28 2017, @04:24AM
Yeah, don't listen to the poor starving and/or dead people of Venezuela, instead you want to listen to the dictator who is rounding up dissidents and political opponents and trying to amend the Constitution to make himself a lifetime dictator. Thanks for the insight.