Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday July 29 2017, @02:17PM   Printer-friendly
from the adding-it-all-up dept.

Today the trend to greater equality of incomes which characterised the postwar period has been reversed. Inequality is now rising rapidly. Contrary to the rising-tide hypothesis, the rising tide has only lifted the large yachts, and many of the smaller boats have been left dashed on the rocks. This is partly because the extraordinary growth in top incomes has coincided with an economic slowdown.

The trickle-down notion— along with its theoretical justification, marginal productivity theory— needs urgent rethinking. That theory attempts both to explain inequality— why it occurs— and to justify it— why it would be beneficial for the economy as a whole. This essay looks critically at both claims. It argues in favour of alternative explanations of inequality, with particular reference to the theory of rent-seeking and to the influence of institutional and political factors, which have shaped labour markets and patterns of remuneration. And it shows that, far from being either necessary or good for economic growth, excessive inequality tends to lead to weaker economic performance. In light of this, it argues for a range of policies that would increase both equity and economic well-being.

Five minutes to midnight, marginal productivity theory "needs urgent rethinking."

[Wikipedia: Joseph Eugene Stiglitz is an American economist and a professor at Columbia University. He is a recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences and the John Bates Clark Medal. He is a former senior vice president and chief economist of the World Bank and is a former member and chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers. --Ed.]


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Sunday July 30 2017, @08:50AM (6 children)

    Formal education in this nation isn't. Education I mean, not formal. The radical left (no, not just ordinary old Democrats) has owned the higher education system for longer than I've been alive.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by aristarchus on Sunday July 30 2017, @11:40AM (5 children)

    by aristarchus (2645) on Sunday July 30 2017, @11:40AM (#546643) Journal

    The radical left (no, not just ordinary old Democrats) has owned the higher education system for longer than I've been alive.

    Yes? So? That does not mean that they are wrong (they are more educated, you know), or that you would not benefit from some higher learning yourself. Everyone here with some college experience can see plainly how your ignorance is harming you, and has utterly destroyed your ability to make a coherent and persuasive argument on matters of economics. Go back to school, Buzzard. We promise not to hurt you.

    • (Score: 1, Troll) by The Mighty Buzzard on Sunday July 30 2017, @12:01PM (4 children)

      they are more indoctrinated, you know

      FTFY

      --
      My rights don't end where your fear begins.
      • (Score: 3, Informative) by aristarchus on Sunday July 30 2017, @12:19PM (3 children)

        by aristarchus (2645) on Sunday July 30 2017, @12:19PM (#546655) Journal

        they are more indoctrinated, you know

        FTFY

        No, you just re-asserted your ignorant presumption stemming from a lack of actual education. When you are not educated, a lot of things you do not understand can seem like indoctrination. You may say to yourself, "How could anyone believe that?" And if you cannot answer this question, then it must have been brainwashing. On the other hand, educated people can understand how people can believe what they do, and so there are far fewer cases where this question does not have a reasonable, or at least plausible, answer. But it also means they do know why they believe what they believe, and can give reasoned arguments for their positions. The uneducated, deprived of this tactic, more generally resort to name-calling, like "libtard" or "SJW", or in your case, "indoctrinated". Come through the looking-glass, Buzzard! It's a whole new world!

        • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Sunday July 30 2017, @12:32PM (2 children)

          Sweety, darlin, honey...

          Education = the learning of stuffs

          Education != attending a degree mill/indoctrination center

          --
          My rights don't end where your fear begins.
          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 30 2017, @02:54PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 30 2017, @02:54PM (#546689)

            Well you learned tech and then stopped, you are worse than Hawkings because you are an ignorant ass who doesn't even have fame in an advanced field yet you claim superiority over everyone else. You are such a massive toooooool.

            Oh, and it is easy to tell when you are triggered, you hop back to overly sweet crap mixed with shitpoints.

          • (Score: 3, Insightful) by aristarchus on Sunday July 30 2017, @06:49PM

            by aristarchus (2645) on Sunday July 30 2017, @06:49PM (#546769) Journal

            Education != attending a degree mill/indoctrination center

            Easily avoided. Just do not attend a for-profit school, or one that has waco right-wing religious sponsorship. That rules out Univ. of Phoenix, Regent, and Liberty Universities. Just follow that pattern. (Oh, the scam schools usually offer to teach you stuffs that will make you more money, watch out for that. Education is not the same thing as training. But you know that, you were in a military.)