Hong Kong is brimming with neon-lit shopping strips that sell luxury brands, jewels, and technology to eager consumers; the skyscraper-filled skyline contains businesses that make the city one of the world’s major financial hubs. Yet behind the glamorous facade, approximately 200,000 people, including 40,000 children, live in spaces ranging in size from around 15 – 100 square feet.
With a population of nearly 7.5 million and almost no developable land remaining, Hong Kong’s housing market has risen to the most expensive in the world. Pushed out by soaring rents, tens of thousands of people have no other option than to inhabit squatter huts, sub-divided units where the kitchen and toilet merge, coffin cubicles, and cage homes, which are rooms measuring as small as 6’ x 2.5’ traditionally made of wire mesh. “From cooking to sleeping, all activities take place in these tiny spaces,” says Lam. To create the coffin cubicles a 400 square flat will be illegally divided by its owner to accommodate 20 double-decker beds, each costing about HK$2000 (over $250 USD) per month in rent. The space is too small to stand up in.
Better than being homeless, but only just.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 30 2017, @12:00AM (2 children)
WTF, now by clicking through some pics I ended up at a totally different story about Horseback Archery in Iran and the back button doesn't work... This is honestly one of the worst sites I have ever encountered.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 30 2017, @03:43PM (1 child)
Many sites have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that SoylentNews is perfect or all-wise. Indeed it has been said that SoylentNews is the worst site, except for all those other sites that have been tried from time to time.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 30 2017, @06:35PM
Soylent news works fine. If you have a site where I click through pictures in one article and end up in a new article without any way to return to the original one (which was never finished), that is just awful design. Not that they care, but I really will not be going to national geographic's website again after this experience.