Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Sunday July 30 2017, @04:00PM   Printer-friendly
from the good dept.

Procter & Gamble Co. said that its move to cut more than $100 million in digital marketing spend in the June quarter had little impact on its business, proving that those digital ads were largely ineffective.

Almost all of the consumer product giant’s advertising cuts in the period came from digital, finance chief Jon Moeller said on its earnings call Thursday. The company targeted ads that could wind up on sites with fake traffic from software known as “bots,” or those with objectionable content.

“What it reflected was a choice to cut spending from a digital standpoint where it was ineffective, where either we were serving bots as opposed to human beings or where the placement of ads was not facilitating the equity of our brands,” he said.
...
It’s unclear whether P&G has shifted more spending to other media, including television, as it tweaks its digital spending approach. TV networks have been making an aggressive case that marketers have over-allocated budgets to the dark alleys of digital, and should move ad money back into TV.

Moving ad budget back to TV would be a brilliant move. Septuagenarians present a brisk market for Pampers.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Justin Case on Sunday July 30 2017, @05:22PM (3 children)

    by Justin Case (4239) on Sunday July 30 2017, @05:22PM (#546733) Journal

    Yeah, that's another thing marketdroids passionately believe: brands matter. On Amazon, for example, I select products by features, ratings, price... but never brand. But sellers think "brand loyalty" is something that will last longer than the first time they screw their customers.

    Well, OK, I guess there are a few people who will buy something just because it comes from crApple. The sooner they are separated from their cash, the less ability they will have to harm the world by subsidizing overpriced hypeware.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by tibman on Sunday July 30 2017, @07:05PM

    by tibman (134) Subscriber Badge on Sunday July 30 2017, @07:05PM (#546776)

    Official versus clone is still a thing though. If you are buying an accessory to something you're more likely to go official over clone if the price is reasonable.

    --
    SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.
  • (Score: 2) by TheRaven on Monday July 31 2017, @09:25AM

    by TheRaven (270) on Monday July 31 2017, @09:25AM (#547063) Journal
    Brands aren't completely meaningless, they're a form of reputation. It's much harder to build a good reputation than it is to lose one. A brand that's identified with solid build quality will lose this reputation quickly from a few exceptions. This is why a lot of companies that produce high-end products use an entirely different brand for products in the lower ends of the same markets. Of course, this cuts both ways and they'll charge you a premium for knowing that you can expect quality. You might be lucky and find that a no-name vendor is selling the same product from the same factory, or you might find that they're selling the ones that failed QA testing.
    --
    sudo mod me up
  • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Monday July 31 2017, @01:53PM

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Monday July 31 2017, @01:53PM (#547139) Journal

    I read just the other day that amazon and other online marketplaces have heavily diluted brands' premiums because users have been conditioned to shop as you described. User reviews have also come to play a much bigger role, so the days of capturing extra margin by outsourcing production to china where quality inevitably suffers while continuing to charge the brand premium are over.

    So amid the heavy job loss caused by the death of traditional retail there's that small silver lining of people saying "so what?" To marketdroids.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.