Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday July 30 2017, @07:46PM   Printer-friendly
from the a-few-votes-here,-a-few-votes-there... dept.

DEF CON After the debacle of the 2000 presidential election count, the US invested heavily in electronic voting systems – but not, it seems, the security to protect them.

This year at the DEF CON hacking conference in Las Vegas, 30 computer-powered ballot boxes used in American elections were set up in a simulated national White House race – and hackers got to work physically breaking the gear open to find out what was hidden inside.

In less than 90 minutes, the first cracks in the systems' defenses started appearing, revealing an embarrassing low level of security. Then one was hacked wirelessly.

"Without question, our voting systems are weak and susceptible. Thanks to the contributions of the hacker community today, we've uncovered even more about exactly how," said Jake Braun, who sold DEF CON founder Jeff Moss on the idea earlier this year.

"The scary thing is we also know that our foreign adversaries – including Russia, North Korea, Iran – possess the capabilities to hack them too, in the process undermining principles of democracy and threatening our national security."

As long as mission-critical systems like cable TV are secure, civilization will be safe.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Sunday July 30 2017, @10:58PM (4 children)

    by kaszz (4211) on Sunday July 30 2017, @10:58PM (#546873) Journal

    Media presented it as a A/B choice. But that is not the reality:

    Republican: Donald Trump
    Democrat: Hillary Clinton
    Libertarian: Gary Johnson
    Green Party: Jill Stein
    Independents: Evan McMullin
    Constitution Party: Darrell Castle

    Within the larger parties numerous candidates withdrew.

    So there IS choice. But people don't get aware of it because media present it otherwise. And the constitution also worsen it by winner-takes-it-all rules. Whack media and the playing field becomes more even.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 31 2017, @01:05AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 31 2017, @01:05AM (#546907)

    Clarification: winner-take-all is not in the US Constitution. The electoral college does encourage it, but the constitution does not even require voting (appointment by state government used to be common when thr US was young).

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 31 2017, @06:34AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 31 2017, @06:34AM (#547003)
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 31 2017, @03:31PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 31 2017, @03:31PM (#547195)

    The trouble is that first past the post voting penalizes those that vote for the 'right' candidate by taking a vote from the 'better' candidate that won't push them past the 'worse' candidate. The so-called spoiler effect.

    The answer is to offer something like instant run-off voting, but since that penalizes the two parties in power, how to you institute it?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 31 2017, @03:58PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 31 2017, @03:58PM (#547206)

      The answer is to offer something like instant run-off voting, but since that penalizes the two parties in power, how do you institute it?

      The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure.