Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday July 31 2017, @06:22PM   Printer-friendly
from the What-does-this-button-do? dept.

Ars Technica brings us an update to an earlier story in which a court case was thrown out when a police officer's body cam showed him planting drugs before 'finding' them immediately after. Now prosecutors in Maryland are reviewing other body-cam footage and have already thrown out 34 criminal cases with many more under review:

The Baltimore Police Department's body cams, like many across the nation, capture footage 30 seconds before an officer presses the record button. The footage was turned over to defense attorneys as part of a drug prosecution - and that's when the misdeed was uncovered.

[...] "We are dismissing those cases which relied exclusively on the credibility of these officers," Mosby told a news conference Friday. She said the dismissed cases, some of which have already been prosecuted, involved weapons and drugs.

Lesson learned cops - plant drugs, wait 30 seconds, then turn on the camera!


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Monday July 31 2017, @11:47PM (4 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Monday July 31 2017, @11:47PM (#547421) Journal

    Timed pauses would be abused. Just don't give the cop ANY control over the camera. Bathroom break? A camera worn on you chest isn't going to be pointed downward at your anatomy, unless you purposely move it to point down. Let it always record.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Tuesday August 01 2017, @01:00AM (3 children)

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday August 01 2017, @01:00AM (#547463) Journal

    Bathroom break? A camera worn on you chest isn't going to be pointed downward at your anatomy

    What's wrong with the camera capturing someone's junk while peeing?
    Will this cause massive mind-blow to someone?

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 01 2017, @09:40AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 01 2017, @09:40AM (#547575)

      Yeah, republicans and other talibans. Because you know, the allmighty creator of the whole fricking universe is as interested in nothing else than your willy.

    • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday August 01 2017, @01:30PM (1 child)

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday August 01 2017, @01:30PM (#547627) Journal

      Breasts cause massive mindblow to many people. The idea of breastfeeding causes mindblow. Pubic hairs cause it. A vagina, or a penis? Such an image, especially if made public, could cause the cosmos to crumble around us.

      Then again, maybe not.

      • (Score: 4, Funny) by c0lo on Tuesday August 01 2017, @04:23PM

        by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday August 01 2017, @04:23PM (#547691) Journal

        Breasts cause massive mindblow to many people. The idea of breastfeeding causes mindblow. Pubic hairs cause it. A vagina, or a penis? Such an image, especially if made public, could cause the cosmos to crumble around us.

        Can you imagine a Rio Carnival in Harrison, Arkansas today? Me neither.
        This is why I reckon US need more Latino immigration.

        (grin)

        --
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford