Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday August 08 2017, @11:43PM   Printer-friendly
from the scaling-up dept.

The sale marks the first time that a genetically engineered animal has been sold for food on the open market. It took AquaBounty more than 25 years to get to this point.

The fish, a variety of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), is engineered to grow faster than its non-genetically modified counterpart, reaching market size in roughly half the time — about 18 months. AquaBounty sold its first commercial batch at market price: US$5.30 per pound ($11.70 per kilogram)

[...] AquaBounty raised the fish in tanks in a small facility in Panama. It plans to ramp up production by expanding a site on Canada's Prince Edward Island, where local authorities gave the green light for construction in June. In the same month, the company also acquired a fish farm in Albany, Indiana; it awaits the nod from US regulators to begin production there.

[...] Scientists first demonstrated the fast-growing fish in 1989. They gave it a growth-hormone gene from Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), along with genetic regulatory elements from a third species, the ocean pout (Zoarces americanus). The genetic modifications enable the salmon to produce a continuous low level of growth hormone.

AquaBounty formed around the technology in the early 1990s and approached regulators in the United States soon after. It then spent almost 25 years in regulatory limbo. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the salmon for consumption in November 2015, and Canadian authorities came to the same decision six months later. Neither country requires the salmon to be labelled as genetically engineered.

But unlike in Canada, political battles in the United States have stalled the salmon's entry into the marketplace. The law setting out the US government's budget for fiscal year 2017 includes a provision that instructs the FDA to forbid the sale of transgenic salmon until it has developed a programme to inform consumers that they are buying a genetically engineered product.

All three fish are edible, but the engineered salmon only contains protein from the Atlantic and Chinook.

The wiki link states that the salmon are sterile females that would be unable to reproduce.

http://www.nature.com/news/first-genetically-engineered-salmon-sold-in-canada-1.22116
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_salmon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinook_salmon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_pout

Related:
https://www.nature.com/news/salmon-approval-heralds-rethink-of-transgenic-animals-1.18867


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Wednesday August 09 2017, @03:43AM (1 child)

    by kaszz (4211) on Wednesday August 09 2017, @03:43AM (#550929) Journal

    If the fish is non-fertile perhaps its possible to test the fish for this to find out as a consumer if it's a Frankenstein fish?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 09 2017, @12:28PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 09 2017, @12:28PM (#551065)

    Well, I have some salmon of doubt about that.