Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Thursday August 10 2017, @07:37PM   Printer-friendly
from the another-day-another-drive dept.

Samsung will use QLC NAND to create a 128 TB SSD:

For now, let's talk about the goods we'll see over the next year. The biggest news to come out of the new Samsung campus is QLC flash. Samsung's customers set performance and endurance specifications and don't care about the underlying technology as long as those needs are met. Samsung says it can achieve its targets with its first generation QLC (4-bits per cell) V-NAND technology.

The first product pre-announcement (it doesn't have a product number yet) is a 128TB SAS SSD using QLC technology with a 1TB die size. The company plans to go beyond 16 die per package using chip stacking technology that will yield 32 die per package, a flash industry record.

NAND revenue has increased 55% in one year.

Previously: Seagate Demonstrates a 60 TB 3.5" SSD
Toshiba Envisions a 100 TB QLC SSD in the "Near Future"
Western Digital Announces 96-Layer 3D NAND, Including Both TLC and QLC
Toshiba's 3D QLC NAND Could Reach 1000 P/E Cycles


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by forkazoo on Thursday August 10 2017, @08:20PM (2 children)

    by forkazoo (2561) on Thursday August 10 2017, @08:20PM (#551846)

    If you have 128 TB of it, you can use all sorts of post-RAID erasure coding, .PAR files, and ZFS active FS scrubbing kind of stuff to workaround the fact that it's a per-bit useless cesspit, and wind up with more reliable data overall.

    32 TB useable after insane amounts of redundancy vs. 32 GB of "reliable" (Not that reliable anyway) SLC flash seems like a completely sane tradeoff.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 10 2017, @08:36PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 10 2017, @08:36PM (#551855)

    32 TB useable after insane amounts of redundancy vs. 32 GB of "reliable" (Not that reliable anyway) SLC flash seems like a completely sane tradeoff.

    One SLC flash drive easily retained the data for 10 years, lying on a shelf. Another is still working perfectly after 15 years of everyday use. Makes me doubt you've ever seen a SLC anything up close...

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 12 2017, @06:05AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 12 2017, @06:05AM (#552765)

      Flash lifetime is dependent on dozens of factors. Voltage, heat, and usage are the most damaging to flash (in that order). Most flash is fine. The environments I used to deploy into it would last about ~2 years. The laptop I have my current SSD in is going on 5 years now (I even defrag it!). Basically if you abuse the hell out of it well it will not last long. If you treat it nicely it will last a *long* time.