Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Friday August 11 2017, @12:14AM   Printer-friendly
from the no-bill-of-rights-for-you dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

Can the government ban the text of the First Amendment itself on municipal transit ads because free speech is too "political" for public display? If this sounds like some ridiculous brain teaser, it should. But unfortunately it's not. It's a core claim in a lawsuit we filed today challenging the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority's (WMATA) restrictions on controversial advertising.

[...] Earlier this year, following President Trump's repeated commentary denigrating journalists and Muslims, the ACLU decided to remind everyone about that very first promise in the Bill of Rights: that Congress shall make no law interfering with our freedoms of speech and religion. As part of a broad advertising campaign, the ACLU erected ads in numerous places, featuring the text of the First Amendment. Not only in English, but in Spanish and Arabic, too — to remind people that the Constitution is for everyone.

The ACLU inquired about placing our ads with WMATA, envisioning an inspirational reminder of our founding texts, with a trilingual twist, in the transit system of the nation's capital. But it was not to be: Our ad was rejected because WMATA's advertising policies forbid, among many other things, advertisements "intended to influence members of the public regarding an issue on which there are varying opinions" or "intended to influence public policy."

You don't have to be a First Amendment scholar to know that something about that stinks.

Source: https://www.aclu.org/blog/speak-freely/first-amendment-literally-banned-dc

Also at NPR.


Original Submission #1   Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 11 2017, @04:17AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 11 2017, @04:17AM (#552111)

    And now the country is the United States and the de facto language is English, if not 'American.' I am, in plurality, Native American - Sioux. Yet here I am speaking 'American' and even living abroad eating hotdogs and hamburgers. And I hold no ill will to any other person in the country for what their ancestors did to mine. It doesn't even make any sense to me. The nature of the world is, for better or for worse, that the strong overcome the weak. People need to learn to assimilate and get over themselves.

  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday August 11 2017, @12:36PM

    Preach it, my wagon-burning brother. No, our ancestors weren't enslaved; they were just damned near wiped from the face of the earth. And yet the vast majority of us get the hell over it. We have completely integrated and even thrived in our reality. Some folks really could take a lesson.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.