Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Monday August 14 2017, @01:34PM   Printer-friendly
from the saving-the-past-for-the-future dept.

The Great 78 Project over at the Internet Archive has been professionally digitizing old 78 RPM records for a while now. These records were all made between 1898 and sometime in the 1950s. Over 20 collections have been selected for digital access and physical preservation with the help of George Blood, L.P. and the Archive of Contemporary Music. So far about 26,000 of the 78s have been added to the Internet Archive. Each disc has about 3 minutes of audio per side. Most of the discs are made from shellac and really quite brittle, perhaps even more brittle than today's digital formats.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by drussell on Monday August 14 2017, @03:44PM (2 children)

    by drussell (2678) on Monday August 14 2017, @03:44PM (#553717) Journal

    Last time I Google this stuff, you could just scan in the record at high DPI and there was a bit of software that would perfectly reproduce the audio from it

    Not even close! Sure, you can get the sound off the record using optical scanning (and in some cases it even sounds fairly good) but it is nowhere even close to "perfectly reproducing" the audio!

    Something tells me you have no idea what you're talking about, as far as sound quality goes. Have you ever even heard the audio output from an optically scanned record of any type?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by ledow on Monday August 14 2017, @05:52PM

    by ledow (5567) on Monday August 14 2017, @05:52PM (#553778) Homepage

    You mean it'll be worse than this:

    https://t.co/QM4hc0rVCf [t.co]

    (One of Project78's examples).

  • (Score: 2) by Zyx Abacab on Monday August 14 2017, @11:03PM

    by Zyx Abacab (3701) on Monday August 14 2017, @11:03PM (#553879)

    A laser turntable would probably be the right solution. (Though that's probably not what the grandparent was talking about.)

    This sort of optical system would be ideal for archiving the records, at high fidelity, without introducing further wear.