SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
The President of the University of Texas at Austin released a letter regarding the removal of statues on the campus.
[...] The University of Texas at Austin is a public educational and research institution, first and foremost. The historical and cultural significance of the Confederate statues on our campus — and the connections that individuals have with them — are severely compromised by what they symbolize. Erected during the period of Jim Crow laws and segregation, the statues represent the subjugation of African Americans. That remains true today for white supremacists who use them to symbolize hatred and bigotry.
The University of Texas at Austin has a duty to preserve and study history. But our duty also compels us to acknowledge that those parts of our history that run counter to the university's core values, the values of our state and the enduring values of our nation do not belong on pedestals in the heart of the Forty Acres.
The issue isn't a new one, they first looked into the issue in 2015, and had a wide range of options including effectively turning the mall into an open air museum, which they eventually decided against. Should the statues be relocated from their historical context just because of the attitudes and behaviour of noisy minorities? (Your humble editor cannot forget the local riots when a historical but hostile-themed statue was relocated.)
(Score: 2) by LoRdTAW on Tuesday August 22 2017, @07:25PM (9 children)
That is exactly why the pyramids were originally built.
That was why it was built in the first place.
No one erected either of those structures as a matter of historical record. They were built to commemorate specific ideas, people or events. Same applies to the confederate statues. They were built because they were admired by enough people to warrant the commissioning of a statue. And you can't really compare 2000 year old tombs and defunct government buildings to people who actively fought to preserve slavery. Tell me, how many statues of Nazi officers have you found in Germany?
(Score: 1, Troll) by realDonaldTrump on Tuesday August 22 2017, @08:05PM (1 child)
Speaking of pyramids and the Kremlin. There's a pyramid at the Kremlin, just outside that terrific wall they have. And you can go inside the pyramid and see Vladimir Lenin's body. Which is perfectly preserved, it's in amazing condition. And nobody says, "oh no, we can't have that radical communist revolutionary on display." They say "oh, how lifelike!" They pay their respects. And they get on with life. In a capitalist economy that is the envy of the world. 🇺🇸
(Score: 3, Insightful) by takyon on Tuesday August 22 2017, @08:15PM
More like a crony capitalist petrostate that is the bane of its people. But point taken.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by unauthorized on Tuesday August 22 2017, @08:28PM (6 children)
Yes, hence the analogy.
OP claims that the statues can only serve their original picture. My rebuttal is that they [blackseanews.net] are not there to suck Tutankhamun's metaphorical dick and therefore it is possible for an object created with the intention of sucking some historical figure's metaphorical dick to have a different significance by giving this obvious example.
I'm not. Analogies are not a direct comparisons, they are meant to establish an idea through examining the common aspects of two subjects.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 22 2017, @08:49PM (1 child)
Don't bother with analogies. There are many people who will suddenly pretend to not understand what an analogy is simply because their opponent in an argument uses one.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 23 2017, @12:21AM
I suddenly don't understand. Could you explain with a car analogy? Preferably using Volkswagens, or Ford Pharaohs?
(Score: 2) by LoRdTAW on Tuesday August 22 2017, @08:56PM (2 children)
Buildings and massive tombs are not good analogies to monuments of actual people apart from the basic idea of it being a historical structure.
(Score: 2) by deimtee on Wednesday August 23 2017, @01:18AM (1 child)
How is a massive tomb not a monument to a person?
If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.
(Score: 2) by LoRdTAW on Wednesday August 23 2017, @12:30PM
True. My wording should have been kept the same as in a "2000 year old tomb". Long dead as well as the entire civilization.
(Score: 2) by urza9814 on Wednesday August 23 2017, @03:15PM
Interesting thing about the pyramids -- the Ancient Egyptians started tearing the things apart after a while. Looting the contents of the tombs and dragging the stones away to construct other buildings. It was later cultures that came through and decided what was left (which only still existed because the things were so freakin' huge to begin with) was worth preserving.
So if we want to treat these statues just like the pyramids...we should tear 'em down, send 'em to a scrapyard, and wait for future historians to find them in a few centuries.