Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday August 24 2017, @01:05AM   Printer-friendly
from the it's-that-time-again dept.

I came across a wooden word watch on kickstarter. I like the concept and the approach this chap took (see also Imgur post on building this watch).

I have little more to add except that it felt like the kind of thing I'd love to see on SN, so here you go. I am not involved with this in any way and am (currently) not even backing this. But I just thought it was a cool story about engineering, and I figured it'd be appreciated. I am also kind of hoping some of the reactions will point out similarly cool small tech projects, so please do respond in the comments with your own SoyVertisements of cool, independent projects!


[Ed Note: We occasionally receive self-promoting story submissions. These are quickly noted as 'bin spam' and unceremoniously passed over for use on the site. (You can well imagine what would happen to the submissions queue were we to do otherwise!) This submission does not seem to fall into that category, but it does nudge up against it. The tipping point for my accepting this story is based on three factors. The submitter has been with the site since nearly its inception. (Submissions from ACs and newly-created-accounts just for submitting a self-promoting story will continue to be looked at very askance.) Another factor is the submitter receives no remuneration or benefit from the submission. Lastly, the item in question does look interesting to me and I think it would be of interest to the community. So, if you do [not] want to see more stories like this, on occasion, please indicate so in the comments. Also, any suggestions as to factors to use to assess these kinds of submissions for acceptance are also appreciated. --martyb]


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 24 2017, @02:49AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 24 2017, @02:49AM (#558284)

    The recent diaries page's google juice had grown beyond some manner of threshold.

    Eventually raph implemented user ratings, and set the default threshold to 3 - so the recent log would hide the spammers from google it.

    The spammers were allowed to roam freely, but that became strangely ineffective for black hat SEO.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Offtopic=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Offtopic' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   -1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 24 2017, @03:25AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 24 2017, @03:25AM (#558292)

    Someone claimed on Wikipedia [wikipedia.org] that

    The motivating idea for Advogato was to try out in practice Levien's ideas about attack-resistant trust metrics, having users certify each other in a kind of peer review process and use this information to avoid the abuses that plague open community sites.

    The earliest profile pages I found on archive.org are from August 2000, and they already showed the peer evaluations, e.g. "This person is currently certified at Apprentice level. " [archive.org]