Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Thursday August 24 2017, @06:11PM   Printer-friendly
from the do-we-have-visual? dept.

LIGO, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory made physics history by managing to detect the previously elusive gravitational waves predicted by Einstein's Theory of General Relativity for the first time. They have, since they began operation, thrice observed the gravitational wave signatures emitted by the mergers of what are believed to be massive binary black hole systems. However, there is no confirmation of these events beyond the gravitational wave detection since black hole mergers may not emit anything else besides the gravitational waves. However, the merger of two neutron stars such as what is predicted to eventually happen to the Hulse–Taylor binary (which provided the first indirect confirmation of gravitational waves in the 1970s) will not only produce copious gravitational waves but possibly also a gamma ray burst or some other associated emission of electromagnetic radiation. The gravitational waves emitted by such an event would be weaker and harder for LIGO to detect, but on August 18th, noted astrophysicist J. Craig Wheeler tweeted a tantalising hint that they might actually have seen just such a thing happen:

New LIGO. Source with optical counterpart. Blow your sox off!

New Scientist reports that LIGO spokesperson David Shoemaker has not denied the rumour, and it seemed that four days after Wheeler's tweet the Hubble Space Telescope had been observing a neutron star binary candidate in the galaxy NGC 4993, which has since been deleted. From the article:

LIGO spokesperson David Shoemaker dodged confirming or denying the rumours, saying only "A very exciting O2 Observing run is drawing to a close August 25. We look forward to posting a top-level update at that time."

Speculation is focused on NGC 4993, a galaxy about 130 million light years away in the Hydra constellation. Within it, a pair of neutron stars are entwined in a deadly dance. While astronomers are staying silent on whether they are engaged in optical follow-ups to a potential gravitational wave detection, last night the Hubble Space Telescope turned its focus to a binary neutron star merger within the galaxy. A publicly available image of this merger was later deleted.

Further coverage and commentary from astrophysicist Ethan Siegel at Starts With A Bang.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by aristarchus on Thursday August 24 2017, @08:23PM (4 children)

    by aristarchus (2645) on Thursday August 24 2017, @08:23PM (#558573) Journal

    Neutron stars are, in the astronomical sense, not too bright. But they are really heavy. So not likely previously known. But this is puzzling:

    A publicly available image of this merger was later deleted.

    Hmm, why?, one would wonder. And why are there comments on a science article on SoylentNews! Must be the alt-left.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=1, Informative=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 24 2017, @09:08PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 24 2017, @09:08PM (#558597)

    Care to speculate why images are being deleted? Wouldnt archive.org have it?

  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Thursday August 24 2017, @09:26PM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Thursday August 24 2017, @09:26PM (#558612) Journal

    Neutron stars are, in the astronomical sense, not too bright stupid. But they are really heavy fatsos. So not likely previously known many would follow them on Twitter.

    Adjust your language to the present, otherwise very few will understand what you mean, magister.

    A publicly available image of this merger was later deleted.

    Hmm, why?, one would wonder... Must be the alt-left.

    On the contrary, I suspect the responsibility stays with the bigoted Christian wing of alt-right. Look, those two were a couple of the same se... errr... kind, perhaps one of them transgendered and upset the morals of the reporter (not that being just gay would have helped).

    (grin)

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
  • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Thursday August 24 2017, @10:50PM

    by maxwell demon (1608) on Thursday August 24 2017, @10:50PM (#558631) Journal

    Must be the alt-left.

    I think it's more likely the ctrl-delete.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by stormwyrm on Thursday August 24 2017, @11:38PM

    by stormwyrm (717) on Thursday August 24 2017, @11:38PM (#558649) Journal
    I don't think it was really "deleted", wording at the links I've found notwithstanding. I think the spacetelescopelive.org site only shows what Hubble is currently looking at, and after the telescope points elsewhere the previous image is no longer available at the site. It isn't supposed to be an archive of everything that Hubble has ever looked at, but only what Hubble is looking at live, as the site's name indicates.
    --
    Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.