Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Friday August 25 2017, @01:09PM   Printer-friendly
from the more-then-just-a-fission-expedition dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

The road to cleaner, meltdown-proof nuclear power has taken a big step forward. Researchers at NRG, a Dutch nuclear materials firm, have begun the first tests of nuclear fission using thorium salts since experiments ended at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the early 1970s.

Thorium has several advantages over uranium, the fuel that powers most nuclear reactors in service today. First, it's much harder to weaponize. Second, as we pointed out last year in a long read on thorium-salt reactors, designs that call for using it in a liquid form are, essentially, self-regulating and fail-safe.

The team at NRG is testing several reactor designs [javascript required] on a small scale at first. The first experiment is on a setup called a molten-salt fast reactor, which burns thorium salt and in theory should also be able to consume spent nuclear fuel from typical uranium fission reactions.

The tests come amid renewed global interest in thorium. While updated models of uranium-fueled power plants are struggling mightily to get off the ground in the U.S., several startup companies are exploring molten-salt reactors. China, meanwhile, is charging ahead with big plans for its nuclear industry, including a heavy bet on thorium-based reactors. The country plans to have the first such power plants hooked up to the grid inside 15 years. If they pull it off, it might just help usher in a safer future for nuclear power.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by cykros on Friday August 25 2017, @05:47PM (1 child)

    by cykros (989) on Friday August 25 2017, @05:47PM (#559012)

    Not to mince words...well, okay, only to mince words:

    Aluminium is the correct spelling if you're using British English. Here's why. [thoughtco.com]

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Zinho on Friday August 25 2017, @09:13PM

    by Zinho (759) on Friday August 25 2017, @09:13PM (#559114)

    Yeah, I was kinda trolling for a reply like yours; thanks for supplying it :P

    I don't use British English, not having grown up with it; however, for the purpose of this discussion it was useful to go with the IUPAC spelling. I have to wonder whether the AC I replied to has a point, in that the typical American untrained in Chemistry has a negative association with the "-ium" ending for names of metals. Sad, if it's true.

    Regardless, until the IUPAC starts renaming other elements to things like Aurium [wikipedia.org] and Argentium [wikipedia.org] I don't see a need to force Aluminum into an arbitrary "-ium" ending for consistency.

    --
    "Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin