SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard
After the US Department of Justice demanded from DreamHost data that could identify visitors of anti-Trump website Disruptj20.org and the web host refused to comply with such an unreasonably broad request for data, the DOJ narrowed the scope of its demand by excluding unpublished media and HTTP access and error logs from it.
On Thursday, District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Robert Morin ruled that DreamHost must comply with the narrowed warrant, but has further limited the government's access to the asked-for data, in order to limit exposure of sensitive user information.
He has asked the federal prosecutors to present a list of investigators who will have access to the data and list of methods they will be using to go through it to find information pertinent to their investigation. The investigation aims to find out who's responsible for property damage in downtown Washington during the Inauguration Day protests.
"The production of evidence from this trove of data will be overseen by the court. The DOJ is not permitted to perform this search in a bubble. It is, in fact, now required to make its case with the court to justify why they believe information acquired is or is not responsive to (aka: 'covered by') the warrant," DreamHost explained.
Good. It's about time the judiciary started saying no to executive overreach.
Source: https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2017/08/25/judge-limits-dojs-search-anti-trump-website-data/
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 26 2017, @08:40PM (1 child)
Ok. I noticed by the FP stories today that I'm glad I don't work at DreamHost.
Besides that, I admit that I have no clue what's going on. I've been reading less and less news as one thing becomes more certain: the world is losing its collective shit, and there's nothing I can do about it. Soylent is one of the only places I check for news any more.
What law(s) did users of the website break?
(Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Sunday August 27 2017, @12:29AM
Dunno. I personally don't really give a damn about the specifics of the case. Some of the users allegedly vandalized stuff during the inauguration or some such and the DOJ is saying they planned it out before hand on that site. Then they demanded the entire site's records instead of just what they actually needed.
My rights don't end where your fear begins.