The US and North Korea are not the only ones ratcheting up tensions in the Orient. From Japan-Forward[1]:
The armies of India and China are locked in a standoff over the strategic Doklam plateau, an area inside the sovereign territory of Bhutan. Under the purview of the Indian-Bhutan Friendship Treaty, signed in New Delhi in February 2007, the tiny kingdom called in for Indian help after the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) moved in under orders from Beijing.
Asserting dubious claims and then engaging in bullying and revisionism to get its way—this is now becoming an oft-repeated Chinese pattern we have all seen before. Indeed, in the offensive launched in June 2017 in the Doklam plateau—which China now claims is a “traditional pasture for Tibetans” (ignoring completely the fact that China predicates the claim in Doklam upon its equally untenable claim over Tibet)—China attempted to build a road near the critical tri-junction border area among China, India, and Bhutan. This area is vital to India’s security.
In the specific case of Doklam, there is a fascinating twist to the tale. China did not foresee India’s tenacious military resistance and political fortitude in response to the PLA’s Doklam encroachment. Unlike the Scarborough Shoal, where Filipino forces quit without a fight, India appears very unlikely to withdraw its troops unilaterally from the Doklam border area, and is standing up to China.
China and India are the first and second largest world militaries, perhaps it would be wise to heed the sage advice.
[1]:Japan-Forward is the English-language publication of the Sankei Shimbun, a large Japanese newspaper with an open Nationalist slant.
(Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 26 2017, @10:47AM (1 child)
My experience is similar to yours -- but while they do cover Trump extensively, to assert that he is their sole topic of discussion is quite a bit of an exaggeration.
They also spend a significant amount of time discussing
illegal aliensundocumented immigrants.And let us not forget their strong emphasis on
coloured people (because the defining characteristic of an individual is whether he or she is [a] white, or [b] none of the above)People of Color®(the phrase loses all of its backwards connotations when you swap the word order around!).(Score: 2) by Arik on Saturday August 26 2017, @10:52AM
If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?