Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Saturday August 26 2017, @08:06AM   Printer-friendly
from the only-slightly-lesser-known dept.

The US and North Korea are not the only ones ratcheting up tensions in the Orient. From Japan-Forward[1]:



The armies of India and China are locked in a standoff over the strategic Doklam plateau, an area inside the sovereign territory of Bhutan. Under the purview of the Indian-Bhutan Friendship Treaty, signed in New Delhi in February 2007, the tiny kingdom called in for Indian help after the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) moved in under orders from Beijing.

Asserting dubious claims and then engaging in bullying and revisionism to get its way—this is now becoming an oft-repeated Chinese pattern we have all seen before.

Indeed, in the offensive launched in June 2017 in the Doklam plateau—which China now claims is a “traditional pasture for Tibetans” (ignoring completely the fact that China predicates the claim in Doklam upon its equally untenable claim over Tibet)—China attempted to build a road near the critical tri-junction border area among China, India, and Bhutan. This area is vital to India’s security.

In the specific case of Doklam, there is a fascinating twist to the tale. China did not foresee India’s tenacious military resistance and political fortitude in response to the PLA’s Doklam encroachment. Unlike the Scarborough Shoal, where Filipino forces quit without a fight, India appears very unlikely to withdraw its troops unilaterally from the Doklam border area, and is standing up to China.

China and India are the first and second largest world militaries, perhaps it would be wise to heed the sage advice.
[1]:Japan-Forward is the English-language publication of the Sankei Shimbun, a large Japanese newspaper with an open Nationalist slant.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by cubancigar11 on Saturday August 26 2017, @03:35PM (1 child)

    by cubancigar11 (330) on Saturday August 26 2017, @03:35PM (#559467) Homepage Journal

    Not for India as the land in question is critical to its connection to its eastern states. For India, giving up this land means effectively giving up all of its eastern states.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Informative=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 26 2017, @07:34PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 26 2017, @07:34PM (#559545)

    Which, if you look at the history between China and India is the whole point. China is famous for playing the long game in disputes and it is no secret that they want Arunachal Pradesh [wikipedia.org] for its various resources. Cut off the eastern part of India and it will be a heck of a lot easier to take and some powers in the region already recognize China's claim over that territory.