Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday August 27 2017, @03:38AM   Printer-friendly
from the efficiency? dept.

http://www.manchester.ac.uk/discover/news/researchers-using-polystyrene-to-make-next-generation-of-solar-panels-cheaper/

Researchers from The University of Manchester are using polystyrene particles rather than expensive polymers to make the next generation of solar cells, which are used to make solar panels, more stable and even cheaper.

The move could significantly reduce the cost of production and manufacturing of the solar cells, making electricity cheaper in the future for the public at a time when energy prices are increasing.

The research, published by The Royal Society of Chemistry in the journal Nanoscale [DOI: 10.1039/C7NR02650A] [DX], shows how University of Manchester scientists are using insulating polystyrene microgel particles to reduce the costs and improve the stability of Perovskite Solar Cells or PSCs.

PSCs are a new kind of solar panel and deemed one of the top ten emerging technologies by the World Economic Forum. This is because they have unprecedented increases in their rate of power conversion efficiency and potentially have relative low cost per watt.

[...] "The perovskite layer in solar cells is not inherently unstable, but the required [hole-transport material (HTM)] layer is. HTM layers made of congregated polymers are thin but they are also relatively expensive and contribute a significant portion of the total cost of the solar cell. In this study we used polystyrene, which is 1 ten thousandth of the cost of polymers to produce, and is also hydrophobic which helps improve the stability of PSCs. Overall the enhanced stability and lower costs of production hugely outweigh any of the decreased efficiency."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 27 2017, @04:16AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 27 2017, @04:16AM (#559701)

    It says "we used polystyrene, which is 1 ten thousandth of the cost of polymers". Say what? Polystyrene is a polymer.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 27 2017, @04:26AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 27 2017, @04:26AM (#559703)

    See title.

    • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 27 2017, @07:23AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 27 2017, @07:23AM (#559736)

      See title