Congress just passed, and Trump signed, a law that makes all properties adjacent to the rail system operated by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Constitution free zones.
From TFA on zerohedge.com:
"In performing its duties, the Commission, through its Board or designated employees or agents, may: Enter upon the WMATA Rail System and, upon reasonable notice and a finding by the chief executive officer that a need exists, upon any lands, waters, and premises adjacent to the WMATA Rail System, including, without limitation, property owned or occupied by the federal government, for the purpose of making inspections, investigations, examinations, and testing as the Commission may deem necessary to carry out the purposes of this MSC Compact, and such entry shall not be deemed a trespass."
As we all know, the standard in the 4th Amendment is a particularized warrant based on probable cause, "reasonable notice and need" as determined by the cops (i.e. agency chief), is not the same thing at all.
We already have constitution free zones within 100 100 miles of any border, and this provides a convenient framework to do a similar thing along any rail line (or road) so the Feds can liberate the center of the country from any form of Constitutional protection. Anyway ... the 4th Amendment is already dead at this point, but its piecemeal demise should provide a useful education for those clamoring for the demise of the 1st.
(Score: 2) by Gaaark on Monday August 28 2017, @01:58AM
Wouldn't it all make it easy for a Fascist government to track and come up with a 'final solution' for 'deplorables'/undesirables....
"More people should think about the full ramifications of our technology and its deployment, before it becomes too late, and they are the ones headed for the chopping block. The reckoning is coming, and when it does it will be far too late to rebel."
Yup. Americans have to start taking this seriously: as do we in the rest of the world.
": Enter upon the WMATA Rail System and, upon reasonable notice and a finding by the chief executive officer that a need exists, upon any lands, waters, and premises adjacent to "
Can we get a legal definition of 'adjacent to'? Yes, as someone already pointed out, could this mean all of the U.S?
--- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---