Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Wednesday August 30 2017, @05:15AM   Printer-friendly
from the no-unity-this-time dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

If you dream of owning a Linux phone that respects your privacy and keeps your data secure you'll want to check out Purism's new crowdfunding campaign.

The security-conscious US-based Linux laptop maker is hoping to raise $1.5 million to manufacture a 5-inch privacy-focused smartphone powered by open-source software.

Starting at $599, the Librem 5 will run the GNU/Linux PureOS distribution instead of Android, and will include a slate of features aimed at helping you protect your 'digital identity' — including end-to-end encryption of calls and texts made to other Librem 5 handsets.

While the phone will use as much free software as possible Purism do concede that the mobile baseband will likely use ROM loaded firmware (but with a FOSS kernel driver).

Wondering what kind of smartphone you get for $599? Us too. As it is, Purism say Librem 5 specs won't be finalized until after the campaign ends. This, they say, is to "ensure the best available components."

[...] If you're thinking of replacing your current smartphone with the Librem 5 you will need to look elsewhere as Purism plan to ship the phone in January 2019.

Source: Purism is Crowdfunding an Encrypted Linux Phone


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Funny) by c0lo on Wednesday August 30 2017, @06:14AM (4 children)

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday August 30 2017, @06:14AM (#561346) Journal

    Well, a little bit freudian there -- wife is obviously wifi.

    Well, to be honest, I wouldn't mind a switch to turn the wife on. Or off.

    Needs to be sturdier than a tiny DIP switch, tho; I suspect there will be quite a number of switches.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Funny=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by Rivenaleem on Wednesday August 30 2017, @09:33AM

    by Rivenaleem (3400) on Wednesday August 30 2017, @09:33AM (#561406)
  • (Score: 4, Funny) by Unixnut on Wednesday August 30 2017, @11:24AM

    by Unixnut (5779) on Wednesday August 30 2017, @11:24AM (#561431)

    > Needs to be sturdier than a tiny DIP switch, tho; I suspect there will be quite a number of switches.

    http://www.toocooldude.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/men-women-on-off-switch.jpg [toocooldude.com]

    At least makes women fun for me, I enjoy complicated machines xD

  • (Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Wednesday August 30 2017, @07:40PM (1 child)

    by NotSanguine (285) <{NotSanguine} {at} {SoylentNews.Org}> on Wednesday August 30 2017, @07:40PM (#561669) Homepage Journal

    Well, a little bit freudian there -- wife is obviously wifi.

    Well, to be honest, I wouldn't mind a switch to turn the wife on. Or off.

    Needs to be sturdier than a tiny DIP switch, tho; I suspect there will be quite a number of switches.

    I'd start with (as with any device you want to turn on) talking sexy to the wife [uwm.edu].

    Should this API call return an error, there are troubleshooting steps [wikihow.com] to address the message returned.

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Wednesday August 30 2017, @11:22PM

      by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday August 30 2017, @11:22PM (#561819) Journal

      This doesn't work for turning off.
      Especially in the case of perceived competition being present, or that time of the month, or ... zillions of other cases.

      --
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford