Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday September 01 2017, @10:56AM   Printer-friendly
from the monumental-decisions dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

U.S. Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke said on Thursday he has sent recommendations from his review of more than two dozen national monuments to President Donald Trump, indicating that some could be scaled back to allow for more hunting and fishing and economic development.

The recommendations follow a 120-day study of 27 national monuments across the country, created by presidents since 1996, that Trump ordered in April as part of his broader effort to increase development on federal lands.

The review has cheered energy, mining, ranching and timber advocates but has drawn widespread criticism and threats of lawsuits from conservation groups and the outdoor recreation industry.

There were fears that Zinke would recommend the outright elimination of some of the monuments on the list, but on Thursday, speaking to the Associated Press in Billings, Montana, he said he will not recommend eliminating any.

Zinke said in a statement that the recommendations would "provide a much needed change for the local communities who border and rely on these lands for hunting and fishing, economic development, traditional uses, and recreation." He did not specify which monuments he plans to recommend be scaled back.

The Associated Press reported that Zinke said he would recommend changing the boundaries for a "handful" of sites.

If you're taking millions of acres off the table for one site, you fail at knowing the definition of a monument.

Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-interior-monuments-idUSKCN1B41YA

Also at RT, CNN, The Washington Post and The Hill.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by aristarchus on Friday September 01 2017, @08:14PM (4 children)

    by aristarchus (2645) on Friday September 01 2017, @08:14PM (#562697) Journal

    For instance the US education system has many problems, but they can all be distilled down simply to conflating seeking a profit with providing an education. Or the modern conflation of government with private enterprise is at the heart of all political corruption.

    Completely disagree. Most of the US educational system is non profit. Instead, it's about most of that system, including the non profit parts simply pursuing their own interests instead of doing their job.

    It's not that I disagree with you khallow, it is that once again you are just wrong. And you have managed to smear an entire profession with an accusation of acting in bad faith. If teachers were pursuing their own interests, they would not be teachers. Period.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 01 2017, @08:27PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 01 2017, @08:27PM (#562703)

    (((librul))) conspiracy!

  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday September 02 2017, @04:22AM (2 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday September 02 2017, @04:22AM (#562848) Journal

    And you have managed to smear an entire profession with an accusation of acting in bad faith.

    I didn't single out teachers. That's you pulling stuff out of your ass. But having said that, of all the parties to the failure of US education, teachers are the ones getting paid to teach. That puts them at a rather high level of responsibility and culpability for what has happened.

    If teachers were pursuing their own interests, they would not be teachers.

    And indeed we see that in practice. A lot of people have abandoned schools, particularly urban K-12, precisely because they can do better elsewhere. And for the rest, where are they going to go? There are no analogous positions in the business world to tenured professor, for example. Not everyone can do better.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by aristarchus on Saturday September 02 2017, @09:06AM (1 child)

      by aristarchus (2645) on Saturday September 02 2017, @09:06AM (#562876) Journal

      And indeed we see that in practice. A lot of people have abandoned schools, particularly urban K-12, precisely because they can do better elsewhere.

      Yes, mercenary bastards that only are motivated by greed, true capitalists, who cannot understand, much like yourself, the value of learning and scholarship, even if it leads to no pecuniary renumeration. Those people are no loss, they could not teach if they tried. Unless they got an endowed chair at Trump University!!! Ah, khallow, you should stick to the tarbaby of climate change! The mechanics of education, I fear, are beyond you. And I say this with the greatest respect.

      Tenured Professor/Business World= Too Big To Fail? Trite comparisons are not doing you any favors. Tenure exists to protect teachers from reductionist one-dimensional thinkers like you. Do you think Sir Issac Newton earned his keep at Oxford? Did Einstein actually do anything at Princeton? Why wasn't Ward Churchill allowed to follow out the implications of his theories at that Colorado university? We will never know, now, what he might have discovered. But you totally misunderstand tenure, if you think it is about a "guarantee of a job". Philistine! Sometimes I wonder about you, khallow. The rest of the time, I know, and it grieves me.

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday September 02 2017, @01:56PM

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday September 02 2017, @01:56PM (#562918) Journal

        Yes, mercenary bastards that only are motivated by greed, true capitalists, who cannot understand, much like yourself, the value of learning and scholarship, even if it leads to no pecuniary renumeration.

        Whatever. My take is that most current teachers are just as mercenary, they just don't have the options outside of education that more competent people do.

        Tenured Professor/Business World= Too Big To Fail?

        Too Big To Fail is a lot of work. Got to network those connections, show up at the events, make the perfunctory, public rituals of contrition. Meanwhile tenure is show up to class, don't do blatant misdeeds, and they can't fire you. Not everyone is keen on working hard for a zillion dollars.

        Do you think Sir Issac Newton earned his keep at Oxford? Did Einstein actually do anything at Princeton? Why wasn't Ward Churchill allowed to follow out the implications of his theories at that Colorado university?

        Yes, yes, and glaring research misconduct. But you do realize that there's been more than three people with tenure over the past few centuries? Not every one of them has been a Newton or Einstein, or brought on the college's opprobrium like Churchill did.