Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday September 03 2017, @04:45AM   Printer-friendly
from the from-infinity-and-beyond... dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

Without much fanfare, NASA astronaut Peggy Whitson will return to Earth on Saturday night—it will be Sunday morning on the steppes of Kazakhstan—aboard a Soyuz spacecraft. Quietly, she will have spent 288 days in space, or nearly 10 months. The duration of her spaceflight will fall short of only one other US astronaut, Scott Kelly, who returned to Earth in 2016 with a lot more attention after 340 days.

Whitson is known around NASA's Johnson Space Center as perhaps the agency's most efficient astronaut in space, regularly getting ahead of her timelines, research, and maintenance tasks for each day. Mission controllers typically have to come up with extra work. Partly because of this, she is one of only a handful of NASA astronauts to have been selected to serve three rotations on the International Space Station.

As a result of these three long duration spaceflights, the biochemist has now logged 665 days in space. This cumulative time in space easily ranks her as the American flier with the most experience in orbit, far above the 534 days tallied by NASA's Jeff Williams and 520 days of Scott Kelly. Whitson only lags behind seven Russian men, several of whom spent time both on the International Space Station as well as Russia's Mir station.

Source: https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/09/americas-new-ironman-is-headed-home-from-space-its-peggy-whitson/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by c0lo on Sunday September 03 2017, @06:00AM (4 children)

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Sunday September 03 2017, @06:00AM (#563082) Journal

    It gets to show that even women can be ironmen, right?

    (grin)

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Funny=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: -1, Funny) by Ethanol-fueled on Sunday September 03 2017, @06:04AM (3 children)

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Sunday September 03 2017, @06:04AM (#563083) Homepage

    Well, she certainly looks like a man.

    • (Score: 3, Funny) by coolgopher on Sunday September 03 2017, @06:26AM

      by coolgopher (1157) on Sunday September 03 2017, @06:26AM (#563085)

      Ethanol burns, who knew?

    • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Sunday September 03 2017, @10:37AM

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday September 03 2017, @10:37AM (#563110) Journal

      She looks competent, I'd say. She doesn't look especially attractive, but she's not unattractive. Then again, she's almost as old as I am - people our age don't generally look drop-dead gorgeous. Maybe your gaydar is out of adjustment? Wonder if I can find any old photos of her - I'll bet she was pretty damned good looking twenty years ago . . .

      Seven years ago, she's not "hot" but showing less age - https://archive.org/details/s120e008866 [archive.org]

      In 2002, she's not looking bad at all - https://archive.org/details/iss005e21040 [archive.org]

      Seems everything about her has "updated" photos of her. Chase down a bio, and a very recent photo graces the page. It's like someone is trying to eliminate any photos that might show an attractive young woman. Let me look some more . . .

      Here we go, a direct link to a youthful looking Whitson - https://archive.org/details/iss005e21040 [archive.org] Found with Google images, but if you visit the page directly, the photo is updated with another, in which she is at least 50 years old. Pretty, ehhh?

      I got sidetracked for a few minutes. There really aren't very many female astronaut photos that make them look attractive. Most of them have little if any makeup, no airbrushing, no skintight clothing, very little skin showing (face, neck, arms, in a few cases shins). The kind of woman who wants to fly into space probably isn't much into glamour, and her employers aren't either.

      There are a couple notable exceptions though. Resnick seems to get special treatment, and Seddon has a seemingly touched-up photo here - https://www.embibe.com/exams/11-top-women-astronauts-of-all-time/ [embibe.com]

    • (Score: 1) by kurenai.tsubasa on Sunday September 03 2017, @01:38PM

      by kurenai.tsubasa (5227) on Sunday September 03 2017, @01:38PM (#563133) Journal

      Go Ethanol! Tear down cisgendered privilege!