Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Monday September 11 2017, @05:57PM   Printer-friendly
from the that's-a-silly-name-for-an-AI dept.

Stanford University researchers have used software in an attempt to determine sexual orientation from photos:

"Deep neural networks are more accurate than humans at detecting sexual orientation from facial images" is the title of an article by Stanford University's Michal Kosinski and Yilun Wang, to be published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. The abstract:

We show that faces contain much more information about sexual orientation than can be perceived and interpreted by the human brain. We used deep neural networks to extract features from 35,326 facial images. These features were entered into a logistic regression aimed at classifying sexual orientation. Given a single facial image, a classifier could correctly distinguish between gay and heterosexual men in 81% of cases, and in 74% of cases for women. Human judges achieved much lower accuracy: 61% for men and 54% for women. The accuracy of the algorithm increased to 91% and 83%, respectively, given five facial images per person. Facial features employed by the classifier included both fixed (e.g., nose shape) and transient facial features (e.g., grooming style).

Consistent with the prenatal hormone theory of sexual orientation, gay men and women tended to have gender-atypical facial morphology, expression, and grooming styles. Prediction models aimed at gender alone allowed for detecting gay males with 57% accuracy and gay females with 58% accuracy. Those findings advance our understanding of the origins of sexual orientation and the limits of human perception. Additionally, given that companies and governments are increasingly using computer vision algorithms to detect people's intimate traits, our findings expose a threat to the privacy and safety of gay men and women.

The images and the sexual orientation information were drawn from an online dating site. Note that the study was limited to white people from the United States, because of the relative lack of images of nonwhite gays and lesbians on the site.

Also at TechCrunch, The Advocate, and The Guardian.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Azuma Hazuki on Monday September 11 2017, @09:41PM (2 children)

    by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Monday September 11 2017, @09:41PM (#566417) Journal

    Yyyyyyyyyyyyeah how about we DON'T commit date rape, huh? Fucking hell, and you wonder where #yesallmen comes from. Cut that shit out.

    --
    I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   0  
       Flamebait=1, Insightful=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 12 2017, @04:28AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 12 2017, @04:28AM (#566543)

    No, no I don't wonder.

    It's actually pretty straightforward: people with a sense of righteous victimhood, or who want to sell that agenda to others, came up with it.

    Or gee, maybe it's a public service that's more polite than #imanidiotstayaway ... wow, now you have me wondering. ZOMGWTFBBQ #ironyalert #mindblown

  • (Score: 2) by RamiK on Tuesday September 12 2017, @10:17AM

    by RamiK (1813) on Tuesday September 12 2017, @10:17AM (#566662)

    Not to bring up my last couple of exes, but I'm not sure you can call it rape when it's the third date and she's pouring the vodka... And then she does it again on the forth... And then she brings her girl-friend... Wait, come to think of it, am I getting raped here?!

    I should have know better when she said the safety word was snu-snu as she tightened the bonds...

    --
    compiling...