Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Thursday September 14 2017, @08:44PM   Printer-friendly
from the when-the-chips-are-down dept.

President Trump has blocked Canyon Bridge Capital Partners LLC from acquiring Lattice Semiconductor Corporation, using the authority granted by the Exon–Florio Amendment. Lattice Semiconductor makes programmable logic devices including field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs):

President Trump on Wednesday blocked a China-backed investor from buying an American semiconductor maker over national security concerns, a rare move that could signal more aggressive scrutiny of China's deal-making ambitions. The deal for Lattice Semiconductor has provided a test of the president's economic and diplomatic relationship with China.

[...] The White House said on Wednesday that it prevented the acquisition of Lattice Semiconductor, in part because the United States government relies on the company's products. The integrity of the semiconductor industry, it said, was vital.

The White House also raised concerns over the buyer's close ties to Beijing. The investment group included China Venture Capital Fund Corporation, which is owned by state-backed entities, the White House said.

The decision could foretell trouble for other Chinese deals under review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, a multiagency group that examines takeovers of American companies by foreign buyers and makes recommendations to the president. The group, which operates largely in secrecy, is also looking at the proposed purchase of MoneyGram International by Ant Financial, an affiliate of the Chinese technology giant Alibaba Group.

Also at Bloomberg and BBC.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by realDonaldTrump on Friday September 15 2017, @02:46AM (2 children)

    by realDonaldTrump (6614) on Friday September 15 2017, @02:46AM (#568243) Homepage Journal

    Lesbians are terrific, I could look at them all day! And trust me, I have. Sometimes I have. The womanly ones and not so womanly, all very hot. And the gays are OK. They take a lot of care with their hair, their clothes, the way they smell. Always good hygiene, always well groomed. Which in a man are fabulous qualities. And the trans are very welcome in my buildings. And on my courses. In whichever restroom they want. The one they feel is appropriate. But I just can't have them in my military. Which has a lot, a lot of wars to fight. And can't be doing all that surgery. Putting the big fake tits, or the big fake cocks, on those who want or need them. Very expensive and we can't keep doing that. There are lots of terrific places for the transgender. Just not in my military. Maybe when we finish up the wars, we can make a different deal. In which my military and the transgender will both win. And maybe we can make a different deal about Lattice Semiconductor. I told them "no" but they can reapply. They can reapply, but I'll give them a hint. If China is not going to solve North Korea, we will. China has great influence over North Korea. And China will either decide to help us with North Korea, or they won’t. And if they do that will be very good for China, and if they don’t it won’t be good for anyone. That is all I am telling you. 🇺🇸

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by Ethanol-fueled on Saturday September 16 2017, @01:29AM (1 child)

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Saturday September 16 2017, @01:29AM (#568790) Homepage

    It's not the tranny part that all my ex-military buddies hated, it's the fact that along with trannies and forced integration of women in non-traditionally-female fields came PC/sensitivity/diversity bullshit that will now get you hauled off to the brig if not forced out just for making dick jokes. Having to carry the females' rucks for them during 20 mile road-marches and accommodate their menstrual needs was also was a bitter pill to swallow.

    Now, the Air Force and Navy have always been limp-wristed sissies so that is to be expected of them. But my bros who are and were in the Army and Marines are describing PC horrors beyond my imagination. Damn shame, too, because if it weren't for PC bullshit they would have stayed in.

    And Americans wonder why all the vets with combat experience are bailing at exponential rates.

    • (Score: 2) by realDonaldTrump on Saturday September 16 2017, @03:55AM

      by realDonaldTrump (6614) on Saturday September 16 2017, @03:55AM (#568825) Homepage Journal

      A woman is bleeding from her whatever and she asks you to accommodate her needs, you can tell her "no." You can always say "no." But a lot of guys would say "yes." It's an option. An option military guys, frankly, didn't always have. And if the other options are 20 miles away, maybe you say "yes." Maybe I would say "yes." But if she wants it licked, that's not happening. I'll tell you, it's not happening.