Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday September 14 2017, @10:17PM   Printer-friendly
from the all-things-must-come-to-an-end dept.

We had two Soylentils submit stories concerning the end of "non-conformist" dorms at MIT.

At MIT, Senior House is No More

This was Senior House, the oldest dormitory on campus, built in 1916 by the architect William Welles Bosworth. For 101 years it welcomed freshman and returning students. Since the ’60s it was a proudly anarchic community of creative misfits and self-described outcasts—the special kind of brilliant oddballs who couldn’t or didn’t want to fit in with the mainstream eggheads at MIT. Some did drugs and dropped out. Some did drugs and graduated. Others were proudly “straight edge,” eschewing drugs and regarding their bodies and minds as pristine temples. Many went on to create startups, join huge tech firms, and change the technological world as we know it.

Senior House was the gravitational center of alternative culture at MIT, characterized by extremes. For example, since 1963 its courtyard was the site for an annual Dionysian festival that began with a whole steer being hauled atop a pit and roasted on an open flame. The bacchanal ended three days later when there was no more mud left to wrestle in or drinks to gulp. By the time the third dawn came, friendships had been forged, tire swings had been swung, meat had been devoured, some drugs had probably been snorted or smoked, jobs had been offered, and lives had been changed.

[...] As school began again last week, Senior House was gone. It’s just 70 Amherst Street now. Was Senior House a toxic environment full of drug dealers and drunks? A respite in an intellectual gauntlet? An artistic outlet? A nihilistic void? It depends on whom you ask.

Alumni and current students describe a community that helped each other, that made people feel safe enough to talk about their real problems. Over and over again people say Senior House was the first place they’d ever not felt judged. What they are describing is, in many ways, a safe place. And yet it was the claim that the dorm was dangerous that led the administration to shut it down.

https://www.wired.com/story/a-weird-mit-dorm-dies-and-a-crisis-blooms-at-colleges

WARNING: the story is a wall of text, and our less literate friends may want to avoid it

Additionally - similar dormitories around the nation are disappearing from other campuses. One might suspect that today's college students are being forced to become conformists, or GTFO.

MERGE: At MIT, Senior House is No More

For many years there have been one or two MIT dorms that catered to the more alienated, creative, and/or radical students. Runaway has found an interesting (and sad) article on Senior House, which has filled this function for some years now.

Bexley Hall was an early leader in this respect. Conveniently for the present nanny administration, Bexley took care of itself...by falling apart structurally. Even in the '70s when I was there, settling on the underlying landfill was obvious with wavy lines of brick in the basement.

Consider a few samples of Bexley's legacy:

Around 1970, there were anti Vietnam war protests, the MIT Student Center was blockaded, tear gas was fired at nearby Bexley Hall...and the dorm residents threw the canisters back at the cops, some from the rooftop.

A little later,
https://www.americaninno.com/boston/mit-hacking-stories-history-of-mit-hacks/

…But They Can Also Outsmart the FBI

In the early 1970s, MIT’s Bexley Hall became notorious for alleged LSD manufacturing. As one could imagine, the FBI wasn’t thrilled, so they called the president of MIT to alert him of an upcoming raid — a raid he shared with the Bexley Hall Housemaster. Authorities rolled up to a “Welcome FBI” sign, as well as a painted set of footprints that led them to nothing but a plate of milk and cookies.

When the agents did start tearing the Hall apart in outrage, they discovered a chest wrapped in chains and covered in padlocks. Too bad all that was inside were three marijuana seeds — “exactly one fewer than the minimum needed for a conviction.”

During my years in the mid-70s we elected a treasurer who was missing a finger from a childhood accident, his platform? "Less fingers in the till!"

https://www.quora.com/What-was-MITs-Bexley-Halls-culture-like

Bexley students liked to rebel against the system; they would try to thwart the administration whenever they could, and they would actively do the opposite whatever was expected of dorms. For instance, while most dorms would rush, Bexley would anti-rush; they would try to scare away students from living there. Some say it is so their current residents could get rooms with fewer roommates. Others say it so the only people who would join would be those who couldn't be scared, rather than people who just wanted to be close to campus.

Bexley looked more like a gang hideout than a college dorm. Whereas other dorms (East Campus, Random Hall, Senior Haus, Burton Connor, etc) would paint murals of beautiful pictures on their walls, Bexleys murals could be more aptly described as graffiti. Bexley also was known for having a lot of people who smoked and used drugs. Basically, Bexley was the opposite of what you would expect from an MIT dorm.

Socially, Bexley was very tight-knit, possibly because they seemed so anti-social to everyone else. I heard rumors that Bexley was full of communists whose dorm president was a cat. Bexley had a lot of people who liked being different.

A lot of students think that part of the reason Bexley was shut down was because the administration hated its culture, not just because of structural reasons.

I certainly remember the anti-rush -- was exposed to it the first time I visited as a freshling and then later used it to keep my nice double-with-kitchen&bath as my own single (shared with GF).

Another aspect of social life -- most residents had a grandmaster key that fit all the rooms in the building. The layout tended to isolate each of the four 4-story vertical entries...except that with master keys you could cut through the back/fire stairs and move horizontally on any floor.

In the last days before the building was condemned, a student video documented the building,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6m8se96yyM
"We lived here, you didn't..." @ Bexley Hall, MIT

And, just to close, here are the house rules,

1. Bury your own dead.
2. No smoking in the elevators. (there are no elevators)
3. No more rules.

Further explanation on this page, http://www.boogles.com/local/Bexley/bexley-description.html


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Phoenix666 on Thursday September 14 2017, @11:53PM (10 children)

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Thursday September 14 2017, @11:53PM (#568142) Journal

    It was leftists who controlled politics in the US for the last 8 years.

    Hmm, yes, that must be why Jamie Dimon and Lloyd Blankfein were sent to the Alaskan labor camps for reeducation while Iowan farmers were forced onto collective farms, and all the stripes on the American flag were changed to red, the blue field changed to deeper red, and the stars changed to yellow. Indeed I too have raged at 100% employment the state-owned factories mandate, and the fact that you can only get a vente latte at Starbucks whose foam has a hammer and sickle formed in it.

    It's sheer socialism, I tell you.

    Oh, wait...

    How malformed must your political awareness be that you would think the last 8 years had anything to do with leftist politics instead of the actual people and forces that do? The people and forces that controlled politics in the US the last 8 years were the same people and forces that controlled politics in the US for the 8 years before that, and the 8 years before that, and the 4 years before that, and the 6.5 years before that (6.5 because it took Reagan a little while to overcome the forces that still carried a torch for American democracy).

    Leftist politics are no cure for what ails America, to be sure, but the crony capitalist ways it's strayed into have killed it for sure. America is dead. Or, rather, undead. We're experiencing Zombie America.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=2, Interesting=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 0, Disagree) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 14 2017, @11:59PM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 14 2017, @11:59PM (#568148)

    Just because the last 8 years weren't full-blown Soviet-style or Chinese-style Communism doesn't mean they weren't leftist. They sure weren't 8 years of centrism or rightism!

    • (Score: 0, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 15 2017, @12:08AM (3 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 15 2017, @12:08AM (#568159)

      Actually everyone outside the US sees democrat policies as a little RIGHT of center. I guess you're a rightwing butter which is why you think this new leftist term is synonymous with communism. Idiot :)

      • (Score: 1, Disagree) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 15 2017, @02:08AM (2 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 15 2017, @02:08AM (#568223)

        Actually everyone outside the US sees democrat policies as a little RIGHT of center.

        No, that's not globally true, unless by "everyone outside the US" you mean Western Europeans and only Western Europeans. The only reason American politics looks "to the right" to those Europeans is because they're so far to the left that everything appears to be to the right.

        The Democrats' policies are quite left wing within the context of Middle Eastern, African, Indian, and most Asian politics. Even within Eastern European and Australian politics the Democrats' policies are quite far to the left.

        Compared to the policies of the Middle East, North Africa and Japan, even many Republican policies would be seen as on the left.

        • (Score: 3, Informative) by NotSanguine on Friday September 15 2017, @05:45AM (1 child)

          by NotSanguine (285) <NotSanguineNO@SPAMSoylentNews.Org> on Friday September 15 2017, @05:45AM (#568311) Homepage Journal

          I hate to break it to you, but Australia has single-payer health care, strict gun laws and a generous safety net.

          The only way Australia really compares to the far right in the US (the Dems being Center-Right, not leftist at all) is their draconian and cruel immigration policies.

          You're talking out of your ass AC. And it smells that way too.

          --
          No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 15 2017, @06:09AM

            by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 15 2017, @06:09AM (#568319)

            They're only draconian and cruel if you are unfortunate enough to not immigrate from another Commonwealth nation.

            We have to keep out the riffraff from worse-off places (like the USA) coming over and sucking up all our healthcare subsidies.

  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Friday September 15 2017, @01:08AM (4 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Friday September 15 2017, @01:08AM (#568195) Journal

    Maybe it's because vocal leftists actually threw their support to the Democrat party? Leftists right here defend Obama and Hillary, routinely. You're perfectly right, left and right are hopelessly confused in this country. Still, everything right of Marx is attacked on sight these days. And, it is well known that "political correctness" was a tool of the Communist party in Moscow.

    • (Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 15 2017, @09:23AM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 15 2017, @09:23AM (#568347)

      And, it is well known that "political correctness" was a tool of the Communist party in Moscow.

      No, it is not, and it wasn't. Political correctness was invented by butt-hurt conservatives during the Reagan era, when they found out that people, and especially hot chicks, shunned them when they said what they really thought. Same as it ever was, same as it ever was. How is the paranoia therapy going? Did you get the Commies out from under the bed yet? Have you had your water supply checked for "floride"? You ever notice, Mandrake, you never see a hard core Commie drinking water?

      • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Friday September 15 2017, @01:54PM (1 child)

        by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Friday September 15 2017, @01:54PM (#568429) Journal

        Dude, there are a bunch of hot chicks on Faux Noise. Your liberal media? Butt-uglies. Think about it. Conservatives have always got the hot chicks. Unless, of course, you think Bradley Manning is hot!!

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 15 2017, @08:15PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 15 2017, @08:15PM (#568678)

          > there are a bunch of hot chicks on Faux Noise.

          True. But they are carefully selected from a large population and not representative of the Republicans that I've seen (who are very well fed, to say the least).

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 15 2017, @12:55PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 15 2017, @12:55PM (#568405)

      Defend Obama and Hillary under what circumstances? If it's against ridiculous conspiracies, that's justified because they are just not true. Calling them lesser evils also isn't much of a defense. You didn't give me much of an idea as to what you're referring to exactly.

      Obama and Hillary are definitely authoritarian scumbags, being that they support unjustifiable military interventions, drone strikes that hit the wrong targets 90%+ of the time, unconstitutional mass surveillance, the TSA, and countless other nonsense that conflicts with basic liberties. I've seen a few people here who deny this (not sure how they can defend policies like that, but whatever), but "routinely"?