SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the he-might-be-a-little-nuts-too dept.
North Korea's defiant pursuit of nuclear weapons capabilities, dramatised by last weekend's powerful underground test and a recent long-range ballistic missile launch over Japan, has been almost universally condemned as posing a grave, unilateral threat to international peace and security.
The growing North Korean menace also reflects the chronic failure of multilateral counter-proliferation efforts and, in particular, the long standing refusal of acknowledged nuclear-armed states such as the US and Britain to honour a legal commitment to reduce and eventually eliminate their arsenals.
In other words, the past and present leaders of the US, Russia, China, France and the UK, whose governments signed but have not fulfilled the terms of the 1970 nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT), have to some degree brought the North Korea crisis on themselves. Kim Jong-un's recklessness and bad faith is a product of their own.
The NPT, signed by 191 countries, is probably the most successful arms control treaty ever. When conceived in 1968, at the height of the cold war, the mass proliferation of nuclear weapons was considered a real possibility. Since its inception and prior to North Korea, only India, Pakistan and Israel are known to have joined the nuclear "club" in almost half a century.
To work fully, the NPT relies on keeping a crucial bargain: non-nuclear-armed states agree never to acquire the weapons, while nuclear-armed states agree to share the benefits of peaceful nuclear technology and pursue nuclear disarmament with the ultimate aim of eliminating them. This, in effect, was the guarantee offered to vulnerable, insecure outlier states such as North Korea. The guarantee was a dud, however, and the bargain has never been truly honoured.
[Ed Note: Since this story was submitted there has been at least one additional ballistic missile test by North Korea.]
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 16 2017, @06:41AM (3 children)
Nuclear-Armed Nations Brought the North Korea Crisis on Themselves
That is how a narcissist gaslights you into accepting blame for what they do. I wouldn't be beating the hell out of you if you had just sat on the couch and not changed the channel.
(Score: 2) by Demena on Saturday September 16 2017, @08:23AM
But who are the narcissists?
(Score: 1, Disagree) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 16 2017, @03:12PM (1 child)
Indeed. Let's call a spade a spade. The real truth is, NK would not be where they are today if Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter hadn't given them two nuclear reactors, and billions in aid, in exchange for a promise not to use them for evil.
They violated this promise on day one.
Ranks way up there in 'the worst deals ever made'.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 19 2017, @11:35AM
Before that, they had reactors, a fuel fabrication facility, and a reprocessing facility [nti.org] and had separated plutonium. At Yongbyon they removed spent fuel without IAEA supervision.