Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Saturday September 16 2017, @05:57AM   Printer-friendly
from the he-might-be-a-little-nuts-too dept.

North Korea's defiant pursuit of nuclear weapons capabilities, dramatised by last weekend's powerful underground test and a recent long-range ballistic missile launch over Japan, has been almost universally condemned as posing a grave, unilateral threat to international peace and security.

The growing North Korean menace also reflects the chronic failure of multilateral counter-proliferation efforts and, in particular, the long standing refusal of acknowledged nuclear-armed states such as the US and Britain to honour a legal commitment to reduce and eventually eliminate their arsenals.

In other words, the past and present leaders of the US, Russia, China, France and the UK, whose governments signed but have not fulfilled the terms of the 1970 nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT), have to some degree brought the North Korea crisis on themselves. Kim Jong-un's recklessness and bad faith is a product of their own.

The NPT, signed by 191 countries, is probably the most successful arms control treaty ever. When conceived in 1968, at the height of the cold war, the mass proliferation of nuclear weapons was considered a real possibility. Since its inception and prior to North Korea, only India, Pakistan and Israel are known to have joined the nuclear "club" in almost half a century.

To work fully, the NPT relies on keeping a crucial bargain: non-nuclear-armed states agree never to acquire the weapons, while nuclear-armed states agree to share the benefits of peaceful nuclear technology and pursue nuclear disarmament with the ultimate aim of eliminating them. This, in effect, was the guarantee offered to vulnerable, insecure outlier states such as North Korea. The guarantee was a dud, however, and the bargain has never been truly honoured.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/05/nuclear-armed-nations-brought-the-north-korea-crisis-on-themselves


[Ed Note: Since this story was submitted there has been at least one additional ballistic missile test by North Korea.]

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by tfried on Saturday September 16 2017, @07:57PM (3 children)

    by tfried (5534) on Saturday September 16 2017, @07:57PM (#569095)

    Ok, so somebody tell me, why can't I post this reply [pastebin.com], or any of the dozen variants that I have tried? Perhaps it's lame, but the filter is lamer.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Saturday September 16 2017, @09:05PM (1 child)

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Saturday September 16 2017, @09:05PM (#569111) Homepage Journal

    Regex typo. My bad. Should be resolved now.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    • (Score: 2) by tfried on Sunday September 17 2017, @05:59AM

      by tfried (5534) on Sunday September 17 2017, @05:59AM (#569293)

      Thanks!

  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 18 2017, @04:21AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 18 2017, @04:21AM (#569621)
    tfried's comment:

    Ask yourself: if nobody else in the world had nuclear weapons, would North Korea still want them?

    Sure. They are not trying to be the good guys or something. Of course very many other count ries would also drool at the prospect of being the only nuclear power on earth, and the invinc ible thug position that would award them.

    Well, anyway, that is not the situation at all. At present, Kim has all the reason in the w orld to want nukes, to want to be able to deliver them, anywhere (at least to the US), and to want to be regarded as the nutjob who will kill as many people in as many places on ear th, should he ever get attacked. It's not like NK didn't maneuver themselves into that positio n, but it's the position they are in. Frankly, the situation is awful, and I cannot think of a good way out of this. However, it is important to realize that the primary reason why Kim is pushing his nukes and missiles program is that he feels threatened. Not because he is actua lly stupid enough to believe he can ever survive starting a war. He's wearing a suicide vest, but pretty clearly he doesn't want to die.