Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Sunday September 17 2017, @05:32PM   Printer-friendly
from the did-they-use-oak dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

The accelerating expansion of the Universe may not be real, but could just be an apparent effect, according to new research published in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. The new study—by a group at the University of Canterbury in Christchurch, New Zealand—finds the fit of Type Ia supernovae to a model universe with no dark energy to be very slightly better than the fit to the standard dark energy model.

Dark energy is usually assumed to form roughly 70% of the present material content of the Universe. However, this mysterious quantity is essentially a place-holder for unknown physics.

Current models of the Universe require this dark energy term to explain the observed acceleration in the rate at which the Universe is expanding. Scientists base this conclusion on measurements of the distances to supernova explosions in distant galaxies, which appear to be farther away than they should be if the Universe's expansion were not accelerating.

However, just how statistically significant this signature of cosmic acceleration is has been hotly debated in the past year. The previous debate pitted the standard Lambda Cold Dark Matter (ΛCDM) cosmology against an empty universe whose expansion neither accelerates nor decelerates. Both of these models though assume a simplified 100 year old cosmic expansion law -- Friedmann's equation.

Reference: Lawrence H. Dam, Asta Heinesen, David L. Wiltshire. Apparent cosmic acceleration from Type Ia supernovae. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2017; 472 (1): 835 DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1858

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 18 2017, @04:36PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 18 2017, @04:36PM (#569797)

    Bingo. Dark Matter/Energy might as well be invisible rainbow ponies or empty flying spaghetti bowls.

    Dark matter could be invisible rainbow ponies, but invisible elementary particles are the by far simpler theory, and therefore preferable (indeed, the existence of invisible rainbow ponies would imply the existence of invisible elementary particles, as that would be what invisible rainbow ponies would have to be made of).

    Empty flying spaghetti bowls are out of the question as those would consist of baryonic matter, and thus would be visible, especially given that there is much more dark matter than ordinary matter.

    Neither invisible rainbow ponies nor empty flying spaghetti bowls would have the right properties to explain dark energy.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1