Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Tuesday September 19 2017, @12:37AM   Printer-friendly
from the community-consensus dept.

Submitted via IRC for boru

Dear Jeff, Tim, and colleagues, In 2013, EFF was disappointed to learn that the W3C had taken on the project of standardizing "Encrypted Media Extensions," an API whose sole function was to provide a first-class role for DRM within the Web browser ecosystem. By doing so, the organization offered the use of its patent pool, its staff support, and its moral authority to the idea that browsers can and should be designed to cede control over key aspects from users to remote parties.

[...] The W3C is a body that ostensibly operates on consensus. Nevertheless, as the coalition in support of a DRM compromise grew and grew — and the large corporate members continued to reject any meaningful compromise — the W3C leadership persisted in treating EME as topic that could be decided by one side of the debate. In essence, a core of EME proponents was able to impose its will on the Consortium, over the wishes of a sizeable group of objectors — and every person who uses the web. The Director decided to personally override every single objection raised by the members, articulating several benefits that EME offered over the DRM that HTML5 had made impossible.

[...] We believe they will regret that choice. Today, the W3C bequeaths an legally unauditable attack-surface to browsers used by billions of people. They give media companies the power to sue or intimidate away those who might re-purpose video for people with disabilities. They side against the archivists who are scrambling to preserve the public record of our era. The W3C process has been abused by companies that made their fortunes by upsetting the established order, and now, thanks to EME, they'll be able to ensure no one ever subjects them to the same innovative pressures.

[...] Effective today, EFF is resigning from the W3C.

Thank you,

Cory Doctorow
Advisory Committee Representative to the W3C for the Electronic Frontier Foundation

Source: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/09/open-letter-w3c-director-ceo-team-and-membership


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by urza9814 on Tuesday September 19 2017, @02:48AM (3 children)

    by urza9814 (3954) on Tuesday September 19 2017, @02:48AM (#570027) Journal

    Fork the standard, not the browser.

    A browser fork to refuse EME already exists though -- Pale Moon. Although it definitely seems like they could use some additional support, so it might be nice for EFF to throw some their way as well. Although honestly I'd probably prefer they start with a more modern Firefox version if they're going to get into that...maybe even just a patch/plugin to strip out EME if possible, shouldn't be too hard to find one guy to maintain *that*.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   0  
       Informative=1, Overrated=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by linkdude64 on Tuesday September 19 2017, @04:12AM (2 children)

    by linkdude64 (5482) on Tuesday September 19 2017, @04:12AM (#570056)

    "A browser fork to refuse EME already exists though -- Pale Moon"

    Funny that you mention Pale Moon specifically - didn't the lead dev recently stand against ad-blocking software or tracker-spoofing extensions or some such?

    • (Score: 3, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 19 2017, @07:52AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 19 2017, @07:52AM (#570104)

      No, he added a flag to one extension generating fraudulent clicks, so that it requires changing one setting to install it, so that hopefully only people who know what they are doing will install it.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by urza9814 on Tuesday September 19 2017, @10:19PM

      by urza9814 (3954) on Tuesday September 19 2017, @10:19PM (#570399) Journal

      Funny that you mention Pale Moon specifically - didn't the lead dev recently stand against ad-blocking software or tracker-spoofing extensions or some such?

      Yeah, something like that, I've got no real opinions there though. Don't mistake my comment above for actual support of that project...I've got nothing much against it if that's your thing, but Firefox is the only browser I'll run on any of my devices. But if someone wants a browser that's taking a moral stand and refusing to ever accept EME, it does seem like Pale Moon is their best bet for that. Personally I'll stick with running Firefox and keeping it disabled, but if they start to screw with the ability to do that then maybe I'll look at Pale Moon. But I really hope I never need to, because Pale Moon's UI kinda sucks... ;)

      Browser-based ad blocking is a stupid idea anyway though, so that would never keep me from switching. Do it right and block at the router or a required proxy server. If I don't want my browser loading content from malware-server.org, why the hell would I trust a game or other application using that same domain? Browser plugins are for reconnaissance -- learning what might be missing from the firewall rules and why.