Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday September 19 2017, @08:22AM   Printer-friendly
from the picking-up-the-slack dept.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-slack-fundraising/slack-valued-at-5-1-billion-after-new-funding-led-by-softbank-idUSKCN1BT0KO

Software startup Slack Technologies Inc said it raised $250 million from SoftBank Group Corp and other investors in its latest funding round, boosting the company's valuation to $5.1 billion.

The latest fund-raising, led by SoftBank through its giant Vision Fund and joined by Accel and other investors, lifted Slack's total funds raised to $841 million, the enterprise messaging operator said in an emailed statement.

The fund provides resources which will help Slack to run as a cash-generating company and the raise will reduce its dependence on outside financing, Slack Chief Executive Stewart Butterfield said.

Also at TechCrunch and Bloomberg.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by VLM on Tuesday September 19 2017, @12:26PM (1 child)

    by VLM (445) on Tuesday September 19 2017, @12:26PM (#570152)

    There are at least two other revenue sources

    One is, being centralized IRC, selling the conversation data to corporations and governments. I've worked for telcos that ran a miniscule profit off government monitoring, we were allowed to bill at standard and reasonable consulting rates etc. Its not necessarily tremendously useful but with a paranoid police state they gotta have eyes everywhere, so they made a place that needs eyes and they can bill for it. As for corporate info aside from outright data dumps which are probably illegal, they could sell something probably legal similar to google's ngram viewer... say you're selling XYZ field products to software devs, how much would you pay for a graph of how often the dev community mentions XYZ vs time, perhaps?

    The other revenue idea is the traditional American form a monopoly and then F over the population. So if 432 million smart phones were sold last year and they all paid a "slack tax" of $1 to have slack preinstalled, then in a feverish VC dream that would work out pretty well. Or god forbid if slack became popular enough that it became "corporate mandatory" they most certainly could charge $100/yr for every employee of a company (not just devs with free accts) in a site license, perhaps. If google has 72 thousand employees that very theoretical site license would be $7.2M/yr, times every company out there. The problem of course is slack has a compelling feature set and intense network effect, but its not "THAT" great.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Pino P on Tuesday September 19 2017, @02:48PM

    by Pino P (4721) on Tuesday September 19 2017, @02:48PM (#570197) Journal

    Or god forbid if slack became popular enough that it became "corporate mandatory" they most certainly could charge $100/yr for every employee of a company

    Slack's ability to increase the price for its service is limited by the threat of "Screw it; we're switching to Discord." That's why, for example, the FamiTracker user community [famitracker.org] and the Cyanide & Happiness fan community [wikia.com] have settled on Discord.