Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Wednesday September 20 2017, @01:32AM   Printer-friendly
from the the-devil's-venom dept.

When North Korea launched long-range missiles this summer, and again on Friday, demonstrating its ability to strike Guam and perhaps the United States mainland, it powered the weapons with a rare, potent rocket fuel that American intelligence agencies believe initially came from China and Russia.

The United States government is scrambling to determine whether those two countries are still providing the ingredients for the highly volatile fuel and, if so, whether North Korea's supply can be interrupted, either through sanctions or sabotage. Among those who study the issue, there is a growing belief that the United States should focus on the fuel, either to halt it, if possible, or to take advantage of its volatile properties to slow the North's program.

But it may well be too late. Intelligence officials believe that the North's program has advanced to the point where it is no longer as reliant on outside suppliers, and that it may itself be making the potent fuel, known as UDMH. Despite a long record of intelligence warnings that the North was acquiring both forceful missile engines and the fuel to power them, there is no evidence that Washington has ever moved with urgency to cut off Pyongyang's access to the rare propellant.

Classified memos from both the George W. Bush and Obama administrations laid out, with what turned out to be prescient clarity, how the North's pursuit of the highly potent fuel would enable it to develop missiles that could strike almost anywhere in the continental United States.

Source: NY Times

Pop Science earlier has a more detailed look at how their missile might work:
How North Korea's Theoretical ICBM Would Work

What is UDMH?

Toxic Propellant Hazards ~ 1966 NASA KSC; Hydrazine Rocket Fuel & Nitrogen Tetroxide Oxidizer

It's really nasty stuff...


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 21 2017, @04:32AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 21 2017, @04:32AM (#570982)

    > toxic but not remarkably so (if one avoids adding it to foodstuffs).

    watch the NASA training video linked in the story,
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDRKeM9kKxs [youtube.com]

    Highly toxic, lung damage starts at half a ppm.