Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday September 20 2017, @12:27PM   Printer-friendly
from the plenty-of-lead-time dept.

Rick Falkvinge writes that on October 10th a committee within the European Parliament will vote on future copyright law in Europe. Former MEP (2009-2014), Christian Engström, provided a description of how to provide feedback to the European Parliament. Polite, clear, to the point feedback from EU citizens and residents would be most useful.

In particular, there are two really bad proposals and three really good proposals that warrant special attention, mixed in and buried in all the words. The good propoals are the mandatory freedom of panorama, the freedom to remix, and the freedom for anybody to datamine. The two bad proposals, quite dreadful actually, are to require sites to carry out mandatory upload filtering and a link tax which makes it impossible to link to articles in the legacy media.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Bot on Wednesday September 20 2017, @01:31PM (7 children)

    by Bot (3902) on Wednesday September 20 2017, @01:31PM (#570607) Journal

    It is not democracy when the "demo" has to actively intervene to avoid being shafted.

    --
    Account abandoned.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 3, Touché) by coolgopher on Wednesday September 20 2017, @02:37PM (1 child)

    by coolgopher (1157) on Wednesday September 20 2017, @02:37PM (#570619)

    Ah, but think of this as the "demo" version. If you paid up you'd get the full benefits.

    (Hint: corporates have already paid up)

    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by bzipitidoo on Wednesday September 20 2017, @03:05PM

      by bzipitidoo (4388) on Wednesday September 20 2017, @03:05PM (#570633) Journal

      Okay, this thread got cynical real fast. Yes, there's a lot of corruption. Yes, copyright extension clear out to 75/95 years was deeply unpopular, and should never have been voted into law.

      But there are other ways to fight. And the first thing to keep firmly in mind is that government's power is extremely limited. They can't make water flow uphill, the sun rise in the west, or pi = 3. Copying belongs to the masses now, and no government backed edict will ever change or undo that. That whole 2nd Amendment Right to Bear Arms stuff misses a crucial point: the pen is mightier than the sword. Free Speech is much more important, and ought to be expanded into a Freedom of Knowledge right specifying that content may not be owned, you can't throw people in jail just for making a recording, and accusing half the world of theft will get you slapped back hard with a libel and slander class action suit.

      Protest, sure. Got to let doubters know where the people stand. But ultimately, should they pass some idiotic copyright strengthening measure, so what? Those bozos who lobbied and bribed intensely will have only wasted their money, and that's good. The law will have no teeth, be unenforceable, and we can freely ignore it. Eventually it may be repealed, or the courts may strike it down. Meantime, support your local Pirate Bay, aka the public library. And someday, even the content ownership cartels will come to their senses and figure out that lawmakers took them to the cleaners, accepted their bribes to pass their stupid laws.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 20 2017, @02:41PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 20 2017, @02:41PM (#570623)

    Democracy mimics capitalism in every way. That's why it's so popular... It allows people to think they have power. Totally fictional, but totally effective. You just can't argue with that. Except that we are approaching its logical conclusion

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 20 2017, @03:25PM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 20 2017, @03:25PM (#570639)

      Capitalism is voluntary interaction.

      Democracy is one group dictating to another group.

      Try again?

      • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 20 2017, @04:50PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 20 2017, @04:50PM (#570703)
        So if I get sick, my interactions with my doctors are not capitalism. I am not seeing them voluntarily. I am seeing them because if I don't I'll get sicker and may die. In the same way, my interactions with someone selling food are also not capitalism. I am not interacting with them voluntarily. I am interacting with them because if I don't get food, I am going to starve. So is it only the luxuries that fall under the rubric of capitalism?
        • (Score: 3, Informative) by choose another one on Wednesday September 20 2017, @05:37PM

          by choose another one (515) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday September 20 2017, @05:37PM (#570731)

          Competition and free markets are central to capitalism, there is always a choice. You interact voluntarily with the doctor or food seller _of your choice_, and if you don't like them you have the right to find another.

          In contrast under socialism or communism or dictatorships you may be told which doctor or food seller you may interact with, or you may be told to get sicker or starve.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 22 2017, @09:24PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 22 2017, @09:24PM (#571828)

    Pretty sure the active participation by the "demo" is a core tenant of democracy.